arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1802.01458eess.IVcs.CVmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
收藏

基于广义高斯混合模型块先验的图像去噪

Image denoising with generalized Gaussian mixture model patch priors

Institut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP(波尔多数学研究所、法国国家科学研究中心、波尔多大学、波尔多国立理工学院);University of California, San Diego(加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校)

Charles-Alban Deledalle, Shibin Parameswaran, Truong Q. Nguyen

摘要:

图像块先验信息已经成为图像恢复的重要组成部分。在这类恢复算法中,一种强大的方法是流行的期望补丁对数似然(EPLL)算法。EPLL使用高斯混合模型(GMM)事先学习干净的图像补丁作为一种方式来规范退化补丁。在本文中,我们表明,广义高斯混合模型(GGMM)捕获的潜在分布的补丁比GMM。即使GGMM是一个强大的结合EPLL之前,其组件的非高斯性提出了重大挑战,以适用于计算密集型的图像恢复过程。具体地,每个块必须经历块分类步骤和收缩步骤。这两个步骤可以用GMM先验有效地解决,但是当使用GGMM先验时在计算上不切实际。在本文中,我们提供了近似和计算配方,这两个步骤的快速评估,使EPLL可以嵌入一个GGMM之前的图像上有成千上万的补丁。我们的主要贡献是分析我们的近似的准确性的基础上彻底的理论分析。我们的评估表明,GGMM先验始终是一个更好的适合建模图像补丁分布,并表现出更好的平均图像去噪任务。

英文摘要:

Patch priors have become an important component of image restoration. A powerful approach in this category of restoration algorithms is the popular Expected Patch Log-Likelihood (EPLL) algorithm. EPLL uses a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) prior learned on clean image patches as a way to regularize degraded patches. In this paper, we show that a generalized Gaussian mixture model (GGMM) captures the underlying distribution of patches better than a GMM. Even though GGMM is a powerful prior to combine with EPLL, the non-Gaussianity of its components presents major challenges to be applied to a computationally intensive process of image restoration. Specifically, each patch has to undergo a patch classification step and a shrinkage step. These two steps can be efficiently solved with a GMM prior but are computationally impractical when using a GGMM prior. In this paper, we provide approximations and computational recipes for fast evaluation of these two steps, so that EPLL can embed a GGMM prior on an image with more than tens of thousands of patches. Our main contribution is to analyze the accuracy of our approximations based on thorough theoretical analysis. Our evaluations indicate that the GGMM prior is consistently a better fit formodeling image patch distribution and performs better on average in image denoising task.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑