公开数据、公开评论和公开对话使社会科学变得合理
Open data, open review and open dialogue in making social sciences plausible
摘要：
如今，保护对社会科学的信任也意味着参与公开的社区对话，这有助于维护研究方法的稳健性并提高其效率。公开数据、公开审查和公开对话的结合听起来可能很简单，但在现实世界中的实施并不简单。然而，鉴于Begley和Ellis（2012）的声明，“科学过程需要最高标准的质量，道德和严谨性”，它们值得实施。更重要的是，它们是可行的工作，并可能有助于恢复社会科学研究的可行性。因此，我认为无论研究经费来源如何，开放数据、开放审查和开放对话这三位一体可能会逐渐成为政策要求。
英文摘要：
Nowadays, protecting trust in social sciences also means engaging in open community dialogue, which helps to safeguard robustness and improve efficiency of research methods. The combination of open data, open review and open dialogue may sound simple but implementation in the real world will not be straightforward. However, in view of Begley and Ellis's (2012) statement that, "the scientific process demands the highest standards of quality, ethics and rigour," they are worth implementing. More importantly, they are feasible to work on and likely will help to restore plausibility to social sciences research. Therefore, I feel it likely that the triplet of open data, open review and open dialogue will gradually emerge to become policy requirements regardless of the research funding source.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
