arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1709.08893math.OC
收藏

电网分布式积分控制在噪声测量下的性能限制

Performance Limitations of Distributed Integral Control in Power Networks Under Noisy Measurements

Hendrik Flamme, Emma Tegling, Henrik Sandberg

摘要:

二次频率控制的分布式方法已经成为解决在具有日益分布式发电的电力网络中对更灵活的控制方案的需求的一种方式。分布式平均比例积分(DAPI)控制器提供了一种这样的方法。在本文中,我们分析了该控制器的瞬态性能,并具体解决了噪声频率测量下的性能问题。性能分析的H2范数度量,量化的同步瞬态中发生的功率损耗。虽然以前的研究表明,DAPI控制器表现良好,特别是在稀疏网络中,并与集中式平均PI(CAPI)控制器相比,我们的研究结果证明,加性测量噪声可能会对其性能和可扩展性产生显着的负面影响。这种影响被证明是减少与控制器的积分状态的增加节点间对齐,无论是通过增加增益或增加连接。然而,对于非常大和稀疏的网络,节点间对齐的要求是如此之大,以至于CAPI方法可能是优选的。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,通过DAPI的分布式二次频率控制是可能的,并且在噪声测量下也可能表现良好,但需要仔细调整。

英文摘要:

Distributed approaches to secondary frequency control have become a way to address the need for more flexible control schemes in power networks with increasingly distributed generation. The distributed averaging proportional-integral (DAPI) controller presents one such approach. In this paper, we analyze the transient performance of this controller, and specifically address the question of its performance under noisy frequency measurements. Performance is analyzed in terms of an H2 norm metric that quantifies power losses incurred in the synchronization transient. While previous studies have shown that the DAPI controller performs well, in particular in sparse networks and compared to a centralized averaging PI (CAPI) controller, our results prove that additive measurement noise may have a significant negative impact on its performance and scalability. This impact is shown to decrease with an increased inter-nodal alignment of the controllers' integral states, either through increased gains or increased connectivity. For very large and sparse networks, however, the requirement for inter-nodal alignment is so large that a CAPI approach may be preferable. Overall, our results show that distributed secondary frequency control through DAPI is possible and may perform well also under noisy measurements, but requires careful tuning.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑