arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1709.06290cs.ROmath.PR
收藏

基于采样的运动规划中的临界半径

The Critical Radius in Sampling-based Motion Planning

Stanford University(斯坦福大学);Tel Aviv University(特拉维夫大学)

Kiril Solovey, Michal Kleinbort

摘要:

我们开发了一种新的分析基于采样的运动规划在欧氏空间均匀随机采样,这显着改善了著名的结果Karaman和Frazzoli(2011)和后续工作。特别地,我们证明了对于$n$样本和${d}$维数,存在与${Θ(n^{-1/d})}$成比例的临界连接半径:低于这个值,规划器保证失败(类似于上述工作所示,同上)。更重要的是,对于较大的半径值,规划器是渐近(近)最优的。此外,我们的分析产生了一个明确的下限${1-O( n^{-1})}$的成功概率。我们的工作的一个实际意义是,渐近(近)最优时,每个样本连接到只有${Θ(1)}$邻居。这与以前的工作形成鲜明对比,以前的工作需要${Θ(\log n)}$连接,这是由半径的顺序${\left(\frac{\log n}{n}\right)^{1/d}}$。我们的分析不仅限于PRM,还适用于各种基于PRM的规划师,包括RRG,FMT* 和BTT。连续渗流在我们的证明中起着重要的作用。最后,我们开发了类似的理论,所有上述规划者时,构造确定性的样本,然后稀疏的随机方式。我们认为,这种新模式及其分析本身就很有趣。

英文摘要:

We develop a new analysis of sampling-based motion planning in Euclidean space with uniform random sampling, which significantly improves upon the celebrated result of Karaman and Frazzoli (2011) and subsequent work. Particularly, we prove the existence of a critical connection radius proportional to ${Θ(n^{-1/d})}$ for $n$ samples and ${d}$ dimensions: Below this value the planner is guaranteed to fail (similarly shown by the aforementioned work, ibid.). More importantly, for larger radius values the planner is asymptotically (near-)optimal. Furthermore, our analysis yields an explicit lower bound of ${1-O( n^{-1})}$ on the probability of success. A practical implication of our work is that asymptotic (near-)optimality is achieved when each sample is connected to only ${Θ(1)}$ neighbors. This is in stark contrast to previous work which requires ${Θ(\log n)}$ connections, that are induced by a radius of order ${\left(\frac{\log n}{n}\right)^{1/d}}$. Our analysis is not restricted to PRM and applies to a variety of PRM-based planners, including RRG, FMT* and BTT. Continuum percolation plays an important role in our proofs. Lastly, we develop similar theory for all the aforementioned planners when constructed with deterministic samples, which are then sparsified in a randomized fashion. We believe that this new model, and its analysis, is interesting in its own right.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑