SANA:生物网络比对中将搜索算法与目标函数分离,第1部分:搜索
SANA: separating the search algorithm from the objective function in biological network alignment, Part 1: Search
摘要:
生物网络对齐目前处于混乱状态,在过去十年中推出了二十多个网络对齐工具,没有明确的赢家,其他新工具几乎每季度发布一次。问题的一部分是,几乎每一个新的工具都提出了一个新的目标函数和一个新的搜索算法来优化所述目标。比对的这两个方面是正交的,混淆它们使得难以单独评估它们。需要采取更系统的办法。为此,我们把这两个正交的问题成为尖锐的焦点,在两个配套文件。在第1部分(本文)中,我们展示了由SANA实现的模拟退火在广泛的目标上远远优于所有其他现有的搜索算法。第2部分(我们的配套论文)然后使用SANA比较了十几个目标的生物学恢复,证明了一些目标函数恢复有用的生物信息,而其他人没有。我们建议,进一步的工作应该集中在改善目标函数,与SANA作为搜索算法的明显选择。
英文摘要:
Biological network alignment is currently in a state of disarray, with more than two dozen network alignment tools having been introduced in the past decade, with no clear winner, and other new tools being published almost quarterly. Part of the problem is that almost every new tool proposes both a new objective function and a new search algorithm to optimize said objective. These two aspects of alignment are orthogonal, and confounding them makes it difficult to evaluate them separately. A more systematic approach is needed. To this end, we bring these two orthogonal issues into sharp focus in two companion papers. In Part 1 (this paper) we show that simulated annealing, as implemented by SANA, far outperforms all other existing search algorithms across a wide range of objectives. Part 2 (our companion paper) then uses SANA to compare over a dozen objectives in terms of the biology they recover, demonstrating that some objective functions recover useful biological information while others do not. We propose that further work should focus on improving objective functions, with SANA the obvious choice as the search algorithm.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。