arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1708.04592cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR
收藏

黄金标准在线辩论摘要和在线辩论数据自动摘要的初步实验

Gold Standard Online Debates Summaries and First Experiments Towards Automatic Summarization of Online Debate Data

The University of Sheffield(谢菲尔德大学)

Nattapong Sanchan, Ahmet Aker, Kalina Bontcheva

摘要:

在线文本媒体的使用正在稳步增长。每天,越来越多的新闻故事,博客文章和科学文章被添加到在线卷。这些都是免费访问,并已被广泛应用于多个研究领域,例如自动文本摘要,信息检索,信息抽取等,同时,在线辩论论坛最近变得流行,但在很大程度上还未开发。由于这个原因,没有足够的资源注释的辩论数据可用于进行研究,在这一体裁。在本文中,我们收集和注释的自动摘要任务的辩论数据。与提取黄金标准摘要生成类似,我们的数据包含值得包含到摘要中的句子。五个人类注释者执行了这项任务。基于语义相似性的注释者间一致性,Cohen的kappa为36%,Krippendorff的alpha为48%。此外,我们还实现了一个在线辩论的提取摘要系统,并讨论了自动总结在线辩论数据的任务的突出特点。

英文摘要:

Usage of online textual media is steadily increasing. Daily, more and more news stories, blog posts and scientific articles are added to the online volumes. These are all freely accessible and have been employed extensively in multiple research areas, e.g. automatic text summarization, information retrieval, information extraction, etc. Meanwhile, online debate forums have recently become popular, but have remained largely unexplored. For this reason, there are no sufficient resources of annotated debate data available for conducting research in this genre. In this paper, we collected and annotated debate data for an automatic summarization task. Similar to extractive gold standard summary generation our data contains sentences worthy to include into a summary. Five human annotators performed this task. Inter-annotator agreement, based on semantic similarity, is 36% for Cohen's kappa and 48% for Krippendorff's alpha. Moreover, we also implement an extractive summarization system for online debates and discuss prominent features for the task of summarizing online debate data automatically.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑