arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1708.00523cs.LGmath.OC
收藏

对偶结构梯度下降算法:分析及其在神经网络中的应用

The duality structure gradient descent algorithm: analysis and applications to neural networks

Brookhaven National Laboratory(布鲁克海文国家实验室)

Thomas Flynn

AI总结:

针对深度神经网络不满足梯度 Lipschitz 平滑假设的问题,提出逐层贪婪更新的 DSGD,并在确定性与随机设置下证明其非渐近收敛性。

摘要:

机器学习模型的训练通常采用某种形式的梯度下降,并往往取得巨大成功。然而,一阶优化算法的非渐近分析通常使用梯度平滑性假设(形式上为梯度的 Lipschitz 连续性),该假设过强,无法适用于深度神经网络。为解决这一问题,我们提出了一种名为对偶结构梯度下降(DSGD)的算法,在对训练集和网络架构的温和假设下,该算法可进行非渐近性能分析。该算法可被视为一种逐层坐标下降形式,在每次迭代中选择网络的一层进行更新。选择更新哪一层的决策以贪婪方式进行,其依据是针对每一层选择在目标函数改进方面的严格下界。在分析中,我们分别在确定性和随机性设置下界定了达到近似驻点所需的时间。收敛性通过一族依赖参数的范数来衡量,这些范数源自网络架构,旨在确认训练损失函数梯度上的类平滑性质。我们在若干神经网络训练场景中通过实验展示了 DSGD 的行为。

英文摘要:

The training of machine learning models is typically carried out using some form of gradient descent, often with great success. However, non-asymptotic analyses of first-order optimization algorithms typically employ a gradient smoothness assumption (formally, Lipschitz continuity of the gradient) that is too strong to be applicable in the case of deep neural networks. To address this, we propose an algorithm named duality structure gradient descent (DSGD) that is amenable to non-asymptotic performance analysis, under mild assumptions on the training set and network architecture. The algorithm can be viewed as a form of layer-wise coordinate descent, where at each iteration the algorithm chooses one layer of the network to update. The decision of what layer to update is done in a greedy fashion, based on a rigorous lower bound on the improvement of the objective function for each choice of layer. In the analysis, we bound the time required to reach approximate stationary points, in both the deterministic and stochastic settings. The convergence is measured in terms of a parameter-dependent family of norms that is derived from the network architecture and designed to confirm a smoothness-like property on the gradient of the training loss function. We empirically demonstrate the behavior of DSGD in several neural network training scenarios.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑