通过对人文学科中的隐喻的分析使无形的东西变得有形
Making visible the invisible through the analysis of acknowledgements in the humanities
摘要：
目的：科学受一个规范性结构的约束，其中包括科学家之间的贡献和互动如何得到回报。作者和引文一直是科学奖励体系中的关键要素，而引文尽管是学术交流中的一个既定要素，却没有受到同样的重视。本文旨在提出人文学科的贡献和互动，否则，将通过传统的研究绩效指标保持无形的前景的轴承。设计/方法/办法：这项研究提供了一个全面的框架，以理解作为奖励制度的一部分，特别关注其在人文学科中的价值，作为智力负债的反映。在人文学科的研究的显着特点进行了概述，并审查作为贡献信息的来源，以支持这些假设的作用的致谢。调查结果：同行互动交流是人文学科致谢中普遍存在的支持，因此致谢作为超级引用的概念在这一领域特别有意义。由于单一作者的论文仍然占主导地位的出版模式在这一领域，研究的论文可能有助于了解社会互动和智力的影响，背后的一项研究，而不是通过作者可见。独创性/价值：以前的作品提出并探讨了目前的确认类型域。本文着重于人文学科，以显示奖励制度中的致谢作用，并突出出版模式和固有的研究特点，使致谢特别有趣的研究领域的社会认知结构的反映。
英文摘要：
Purpose: Science is subject to a normative structure that includes how the contributions and interactions between scientists are rewarded. Authorship and citations have been the key elements within the reward system of science, whereas acknowledgements, despite being a well-established element in scholarly communication, have not received the same attention. This paper aims to put forward the bearing of acknowledgements in the humanities to bring to the foreground contributions and interactions that, otherwise, would remain invisible through traditional indicators of research performance. Design/methodology/approach: The study provides a comprehensive framework to understanding acknowledgements as part of the reward system with a special focus on its value in the humanities as a reflection of intellectual indebtedness. The distinctive features of research in the humanities are outlined and the role of acknowledgements as a source of contributorship information is reviewed to support these assumptions. Findings: Peer interactive communication is the prevailing support thanked in the acknowledgements of humanities, so the notion of acknowledgements as super-citations can make special sense in this area. Since single-authored papers still predominate as publishing pattern in this domain, the study of acknowledgements might help to understand social interactions and intellectual influences that lie behind a piece of research and are not visible through authorship. Originality/value: Previous works have proposed and explored the prevailing acknowledgement types by domain. This paper focuses on the humanities to show the role of acknowledgements within the reward system and highlight publication patterns and inherent research features which make acknowledgements particularly interesting in the area as reflection of the socio-cognitive structure of research.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
