arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1706.03597stat.ME
收藏

概率偏最小二乘模型:可辨识性、估计及应用

Probabilistic partial least squares model: Identifiability, estimation and application

Said el Bouhaddani, Hae-Won Uh, Caroline Hayward, Geurt Jongbloed, Jeanine Houwing-Duistermaat

摘要:

随着数据集的数量和复杂性的快速增加,需要能够提取有用信息的方法,例如为相同的人测量的两个数据集之间的关系。偏最小二乘(PLS)方法可用于该降维任务。在生命科学领域,对各项研究的结果进行了比较和合并。因此,参数需要是可识别的,这不是PLS的情况。此外,PLS是一种算法,而流行病学研究设计往往是结果依赖性的,分析这些数据的方法需要一个概率公式。此外,概率模型为推断提供了统计框架。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了概率PLS(PPLS)。我们得到的极大似然估计,满足可识别性条件,通过使用期望最大化算法与约束优化的M步骤。我们表明,PPLS参数是可识别的签署。仿真研究进行了研究PPLS的性能相比,现有的方法。PPLS估计在各种情况下都表现良好,即使在高维情况下也是如此。最值得注意的是,这些估计值似乎对偏离正态分布的情况具有鲁棒性。为了说明我们的方法,我们将其应用于来自两个队列的IgG聚糖数据。我们的PPLS模型提供了两个队列的洞察力和可解释的结果。

英文摘要:

With a rapid increase in volume and complexity of data sets, there is a need for methods that can extract useful information, for example the relationship between two data sets measured for the same persons. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) method can be used for this dimension reduction task. Within life sciences, results across studies are compared and combined. Therefore, parameters need to be identifiable, which is not the case for PLS. In addition, PLS is an algorithm, while epidemiological study designs are often outcome-dependent and methods to analyze such data require a probabilistic formulation. Moreover, a probabilistic model provides a statistical framework for inference. To address these issues, we develop Probabilistic PLS (PPLS). We derive maximum likelihood estimators that satisfy the identifiability conditions by using an EM algorithm with a constrained optimization in the M step. We show that the PPLS parameters are identifiable up to sign. A simulation study is conducted to study the performance of PPLS compared to existing methods. The PPLS estimates performed well in various scenarios, even in high dimensions. Most notably, the estimates seem to be robust against departures from normality. To illustrate our method, we applied it to IgG glycan data from two cohorts. Our PPLS model provided insight as well as interpretable results across the two cohorts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑