arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1610.08331physics.gen-ph
收藏

基础物理学研究的现状与科学知识的未来之路

The Contemporary State of Fundamental Physical Research and the Future Path to Scientific Knowledge

Milos V. Lokajicek, J. Prochazka

摘要:

经典物理学使人们能够在标准宏观尺度上获得有关自然界物理性质的重要知识。这些成就是通过使用因果本体论方法(最初由亚里士多德提出)来制定物理现实的模型。然而,在20世纪初,物理学界开始倾向于基于与人类知识完全不同的方法的模型。哥本哈根量子力学(CQM)被用来描述微观世界。狭义相对论用于描述高速运动物体在宏观和微观区域的运动学。这种现象学的知识方法更关注事物是如何出现的,而不是它们的实际属性和因果关系。在20世纪中叶,因果本体论方法被用来发展一个重要的科学进步:在三维同位旋空间中,基于自旋值为1、1/2和0的统一代数,基本强相互作用粒子的系统化。然而,它后来强烈变形的影响下的唯象方法和夸克模型。本文将表明,几乎所有当代物理实在的理论模型都包含错误或未解决的问题。如果(也只有当)科学家回到成功的因果本体论方法和证伪,才能取得进一步的科学进步。经典物理学可以稍微推广,以使惯性质量的增加依赖于速度的描述,取代相对论和CQM。新的假设可以使用广义经典物理学(GCP)来制定新的描述观察到的现象,以前不准确的解释和用于促进根本不充分的理论。

英文摘要:

Classical physics has enabled the acquisition of significant knowledge of the physical properties of nature on a standard macroscopic scale. These achievements were driven by use of the causal ontological approach (proposed originally by Aristotle) to formulate models of physical reality. At the beginning of the 20th century, however, the physics community began to prefer models based on a fundamentally different approach to human knowledge. Copenhagen quantum mechanics (CQM) was used to describe the micro-world. The special theory of relativity was used to describe the kinematics of objects moving at high velocity values in both the macroscopic and microscopic regions. This phenomenological approach to knowledge has been more focused on how things appear - instead of their actual properties and causal sequence. In the middle of the 20th century, the causal ontological approach was used to develop a significant scientific advance: the systematization of fundamental strongly interacting particles on the basis of unified algebra in three-dimensional isotopic spin space for spin values 1, 1/2, and 0. However, it was later strongly deformed under the influence of the phenomenological approach and the quark model. This paper will show that practically all contemporary theoretical models of physical reality contain mistakes or unresolved problems. Further scientific progress can be obtained if (and only if) scientists return to the successful causal ontological approach and falsification. Classical physics may be slightly generalized to enable the description of inertia mass increase in dependence on velocity, replacing the relativity theory and CQM. New assumptions may then be employed using generalized classical physics (GCP) to formulate new descriptions of observed phenomena that were previously inaccurately interpreted and used to promote fundamentally inadequate theories.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑