arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1609.08049cs.DLcs.AIcs.SE
收藏

支持系统性文献综述的循证本体研究

Towards Evidence-Based Ontology for Supporting Systematic Literature Review

The Lab for Internet Software Technologies Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院软件研究所互联网软件技术实验室);Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院研究生院);National ICT Australia, University of New South Wales(澳大利亚国家信息与通信技术研究院,新南威尔士大学)

Yueming Sun, Ye Yang, He Zhang, Wen Zhang, Qing Wang

摘要:

[研究背景]:系统文献综述(Systematic Literature Review,SLR)已成为软件工程的一种重要研究方法。[Aim]本文提出了一种方法,利用经验演变的本体,以支持自动化的关键SLR活动。【方法】:首先,我们提出了一个本体,SLRONT,建立在SLR经验和最佳实践的基础上,以捕捉常见的术语和它们之间的关系在SLR过程中;第二,我们提出了一个扩展版本的SLRONT,COSONT和实例化它的知识和概念提取结构化摘要。案例研究说明了应用它来支持SLR步骤的细节。【结果】:结果表明,通过使用COSONT,我们得到了相同的结论,与纯粹的手工工作相比,但所涉及的工作量显着减少。[结论]利用本体论的方法可以有效地支持系统性文献综述的开展。

英文摘要:

[Background]: Systematic Literature Review (SLR) has become an important software engineering research method but costs tremendous efforts. [Aim]: This paper proposes an approach to leverage on empirically evolved ontology to support automating key SLR activities. [Method]: First, we propose an ontology, SLRONT, built on SLR experiences and best practices as a groundwork to capture common terminologies and their relationships during SLR processes; second, we present an extended version of SLRONT, the COSONT and instantiate it with the knowledge and concepts extracted from structured abstracts. Case studies illustrate the details of applying it for supporting SLR steps. [Results]: Results show that through using COSONT, we acquire the same conclusion compared with sheer manual works, but the efforts involved is significantly reduced. [Conclusions]: The approach of using ontology could effectively and efficiently support the conducting of systematic literature review.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑