arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1609.03344stat.MLcs.LGecon.GNmath.STq-fin.ECstat.COstat.TH
收藏

有限样本与渐近分析中的泛化能力研究:以正则化回归应用为例

Finite-sample and asymptotic analysis of generalization ability with an application to penalized regression

University of Sydney(悉尼大学)

Ning Xu, Jian Hong, Timothy C. G. Fisher

AI总结:

本文从泛化能力角度研究极值估计器性能,推导了泛化误差上界,并探讨了交叉验证中K值对偏差方差权衡的影响,证明了正则化回归估计在高维数据下的L2一致性。

摘要:

本文从泛化能力(GA)角度研究极值估计器的性能:即模型在新样本上预测结果的能力。通过适应经典集中不等式,我们推导了经验外样本预测误差的上界,作为样本内误差、样本量、误差分布尾部重性及模型复杂度的函数。我们证明误差界可用于调节关键估计超参数,如交叉验证中K值。我们还展示了K值如何影响交叉验证的偏差方差权衡。最后,我们证明所有正则化回归估计在n≥p和n<p情况下均为L2一致。通过模拟验证了关键结果。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we study the performance of extremum estimators from the perspective of generalization ability (GA): the ability of a model to predict outcomes in new samples from the same population. By adapting the classical concentration inequalities, we derive upper bounds on the empirical out-of-sample prediction errors as a function of the in-sample errors, in-sample data size, heaviness in the tails of the error distribution, and model complexity. We show that the error bounds may be used for tuning key estimation hyper-parameters, such as the number of folds $K$ in cross-validation. We also show how $K$ affects the bias-variance trade-off for cross-validation. We demonstrate that the $\mathcal{L}_2$-norm difference between penalized and the corresponding un-penalized regression estimates is directly explained by the GA of the estimates and the GA of empirical moment conditions. Lastly, we prove that all penalized regression estimates are $L_2$-consistent for both the $n \geqslant p$ and the $n < p$ cases. Simulations are used to demonstrate key results. Keywords: generalization ability, upper bound of generalization error, penalized regression, cross-validation, bias-variance trade-off, $\mathcal{L}_2$ difference between penalized and unpenalized regression, lasso, high-dimensional data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑