arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1607.06280stat.MLcs.LG
收藏

基于高维稀疏数据的分类模型解释

Explaining Classification Models Built on High-Dimensional Sparse Data

University of Antwerp(安特卫普大学);Zocdoc;New York University (Stern)(纽约大学(斯特恩商学院))

Julie Moeyersoms, Brian d'Alessandro, Foster Provost, David Martens

摘要:

预测建模应用程序越来越多地使用代表人们行为、意见和交互的数据。细粒度的行为数据往往具有与传统数据不同的结构,是非常高维和稀疏的。从这些数据构建的模型很难解释,因为它们包含数千甚至数百万个特征。列出具有大模型系数的特征是不够的,因为模型系数不包含关于特征存在的信息,这在分析稀疏数据时是关键的。在本文中,我们通过列出重要特征来介绍两种解释预测模型的方法。我们根据“物有所值"的解释来评估这些替代方案,即,对于所列出的给定数量的特征,解释了多少个示例的推断。底线是:(1)与仅仅列出高系数特征相比,提出的替代方案具有双倍的性价比,(2)有趣的是,尽管它们来自不同的来源和动机,但这两个新的替代方案提供了惊人相似的重要特征排名。

英文摘要:

Predictive modeling applications increasingly use data representing people's behavior, opinions, and interactions. Fine-grained behavior data often has different structure from traditional data, being very high-dimensional and sparse. Models built from these data are quite difficult to interpret, since they contain many thousands or even many millions of features. Listing features with large model coefficients is not sufficient, because the model coefficients do not incorporate information on feature presence, which is key when analysing sparse data. In this paper we introduce two alternatives for explaining predictive models by listing important features. We evaluate these alternatives in terms of explanation "bang for the buck,", i.e., how many examples' inferences are explained for a given number of features listed. The bottom line: (i) The proposed alternatives have double the bang-for-the-buck as compared to just listing the high-coefficient features, and (ii) interestingly, although they come from different sources and motivations, the two new alternatives provide strikingly similar rankings of important features.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑