arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1602.04420math.OCcs.SYeess.SY

美国频率调节市场中储能参与政策的比较

A Comparison of Policies on the Participation of Storage in U.S. Frequency Regulation Markets

Bolun Xu, Yury Dvorkin, Daniel S. Kirschen, C. A. Silva-Monroy, Jean-Paul Watson

AI总结:

本文比较了美国频率调节市场中影响储能参与的政策,分析不同政策下储能系统的收益差异。

摘要:

由于能源存储系统比传统发电机具有更好的爬坡特性,其参与频率调节应有助于平衡负荷和发电。然而,它们无法无限持续输出。因此,系统运营商已实施新政策,以利用储能系统的快速爬坡能力,同时缓解其有限能量容量的问题。本文对比了几种直接影响储能系统参与频率调节的美国政策,并比较了在每种政策下此类系统所有者可能获得的收益。

英文摘要:

Because energy storage systems have better ramping characteristics than traditional generators, their participation in frequency regulation should facilitate the balancing of load and generation. However, they cannot sustain their output indefinitely. System operators have therefore implemented new frequency regulation policies to take advantage of the fast ramps that energy storage systems can deliver while alleviating the problems associated with their limited energy capacity. This paper contrasts several U.S. policies that directly affect the participation of energy storage systems in frequency regulation and compares the revenues that the owners of such systems might achieve under each policy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑