对“关于`电荷分布时刻氢兰姆位移有限尺寸修正展开的分解'的评论”的答复
Reply to "Comment on `Breakdown of the expansion of finite-size corrections to the hydrogen Lamb shift in moments of charge distribution'"
摘要：
为了遵守评论[J. Arrington，arXiv：1602.01461]的批评，我们考虑质子电形状因子的另一种修改，它解决了“质子半径之谜”。所提出的修改满足了评论中提出的所有一致性标准，但对谜题的影响与原始论文相似。与评论的结论性声明相反，不难发现在低$Q$下对形状因子进行特别修改，以解决差异并与分析性约束一致。我们再一次强调，在找到物理机制之前，我们不认为对质子形状因子的这种特别修改是解决这个难题的办法。
英文摘要：
To comply with the critique of the Comment [J. Arrington, arXiv:1602.01461], we consider another modification of the proton electric form factor, which resolves the "proton-radius puzzle". The proposed modification satisfies all the consistency criteria put forward in the Comment, and yet has a similar impact on the puzzle as that of the original paper. Contrary to the concluding statement of the Comment, it is not difficult to find an ad hoc modification of the form factor at low $Q$ that resolves the discrepancy and is consistent with analyticity constraints. We emphasize once again that we do not consider such an ad hoc modification of the proton form factor to be a solution of the puzzle until a physical mechanism for it is found.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
