arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1601.04429math.NAcs.NA
收藏

灵活的稀疏正则化

Flexible sparse regularization

Dirk A. Lorenz, Elena Resmerita

AI总结:

本文提出一种灵活的稀疏正则化方法,通过调整指数参数,引入F-范数框架,解决了稀疏解重建中正则化指数选择的哲学和数值问题。

摘要:

Daubechies, Defrise, DeMol的开创性论文明确了使用p∈[1,2)的ℓ^p空间及其相应范数的p次方是处理ill-posed问题稀疏解重建的合适设置。虽然p=1在大多数情况下表现最佳,但p∈(0,1)的ℓ^p空间与相应准范数也受到广泛认可,尽管非凸性带来了挑战。本文引入了更灵活的稀疏正则化方法,通过调整指数参数,引入F-范数框架,该框架不依赖于范数空间,但使用所谓的F-范数。有趣的结果是,某些F-范数可以生成ℓ^1空间,但它们是严格凸的,而ℓ^1-范数只是凸的。

英文摘要:

The seminal paper of Daubechies, Defrise, DeMol made clear that $\ell^p$ spaces with $p\in [1,2)$ and $p$-powers of the corresponding norms are appropriate settings for dealing with reconstruction of sparse solutions of ill-posed problems by regularization. It seems that the case $p=1$ provides the best results in most of the situations compared to the cases $p\in (1,2)$. An extensive literature gives great credit also to using $\ell^p$ spaces with $p\in (0,1)$ together with the corresponding quasinorms, although one has to tackle challenging numerical problems raised by the non-convexity of the quasi-norms. In any of these settings, either super, linear or sublinear, the question of how to choose the exponent $p$ has been not only a numerical issue, but also a philosophical one. In this work we introduce a more flexible way of sparse regularization by varying exponents. We introduce the corresponding functional analytic framework, that leaves the setting of normed spaces but works with so-called F-norms. One curious result is that there are F-norms which generate the $\ell^1$ space, but they are strictly convex, while the $\ell^1$-norm is just convex.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑