Reply to Chakrabarty et al.: Particles move even in ideal glasses
英文摘要：
Reply to the preceding letter by Chakrabarty et al. [Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, no. 35, E4818-E4820 (2015)].
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
相关论文
Reply to Comment on "Triviality of the Ground State Structure in Ising Spin Glasses"
We reply to the comment of Marinari and Parisi [cond-mat/0002457 v2] on our paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5126 (1999) and cond-mat/9906323]. We show that the data in the comment are affected by strong finite-size corrections. Therefore the original conclusion of our paper still stands.
cond-mat.dis-nn
Reply to Comment on "Two time scales and violation of the Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem in a finite dimensional model for structural glasses"
In a Comment (cond-mat/0103444) on our recent paper "Two time scales and violation of FDT in a finite dimensional model for structural glasses" [1], A. de Candia and A. Coniglio show evidence that the equilibrium overlap distribution P(q) of the frustrated Ising lattice gas (FILG) does not coincide with the one that could be estimated from the off-equilibrium results presented in [1]. In this Reply we show new results on the glassy phase of the FILG that clarify the controversy. Nevertheless, the structure of the equilibrium P(q) remains an open problem. [1] F. Ricci-Tersenghi, D. A. Stariolo …
cond-mat.dis-nn
Reply to "Comment on Evidence for the droplet picture of spin glasses"
Using Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) and the Migdal-Kadanoff approximation (MKA), Marinari et al. study in their comment on our paper the link overlap between two replicas of a three-dimensional Ising spin glass in the presence of a coupling between the replicas. They claim that the results of the MCS indicate replica symmetry breaking (RSB), while those of the MKA are trivial, and that moderate size lattices display the true low temperature behavior. Here we show that these claims are incorrect, and that the results of MCS and MKA both can be explained within the droplet picture.
cond-mat.dis-nn
Reply to Comment on "Microscopic theory of network glasses"
In a Comment (cond-mat/0310030) on our recent paper on network glasses (Phys. Rev. Lett., 2003, 90, 085505), Micoulaut and Boolchand (MB) compare our predictions on glass transitions in network systems for the ratios of the transition temperatures TA/TG and TK/TG with experimental data. They claim significant differences between experiment and theory are seen and claim the lack of agreement is due to flaws in our theory. Their comparison of TA/TG is incorrect as they do not measure the same quantity that our theory predicts. The TK/TG comparison shows remarkable agreement between theory and ex…
cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-sci
Reply to Comment on "Stripe glasses: self generated randomness in a uniformly frustrated system"
Using our previous results for the configurational entropy of a stripe glass as well as a variational result for the bare surface tension of entropic droplets we show that there is no disagreement between the numerical simulations of Grousson et al. and our theory. The claim that our theory disagrees with numerical simulations is based on the assumption that the surface tension is independent of the frustration parameter Q of the model. However, we show in this Reply that it varies strongly with Q and that the resulting Q-dependence of the kinetic fragility agrees with the one obtained by Grou…
cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-el
Reply to Comment on "Ising Spin Glasses in a Magnetic Field"
The problem of the survival of a spin glass phase in the presence of a field has been a challenging one for a long time. To date, all attempts using equilibrium Monte Carlo methods have been unconclusive. In their comment to our paper, Marinari, Parisi and Zuliani use out-of-equilibrium measurements to test for an Almeida-Thouless line. In our view such a dynamic approach is not based on very solid foundations in finite dimensional systems and so cannot be as compelling as equilibrium approaches. Nevertheless, the results of those authors suggests that there is a critical field near B=0.4 at z…
cond-mat.dis-nn
更多相关论文收起更多论文
Reply to "Comment on "Critical Point Scaling of Ising Spin Glasses in a Magnetic Field" "
In his Comment, Temesvári objects to a remark in our paper [Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 91}, 104432 (2015)] that his result for the form of the Almeida-Thouless (AT) line obtained in an earlier paper with Parisi [Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 858}, 293 (2012)] in six dimensions can be obtained by taking the limit of $d \to 6$ in the equations valid for $d>6$, but that this violated one of the inequalities needed for their validity. He is just pointing out that they gave a derivation of the form of the AT line in six dimensions in [Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 858}, 293 (2012)] which avoided this difficulty. However, i…
cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech
Reply to comment on 'Real-space renormalization-group methods for hierarchical spin glasses'
In their comment, Angelini et al. object to the conclusion of [J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 52:445002, 2019] (1), where we show that in [Phys. Rev. B, 87:134201, 2013] the exponent $ν$ has been obtained by applying a mathematical relation in a regime where this relation is not valid. We observe that the criticism above on the mathematical validity of such relation has not been addressed in the comment. Our criticism thus remains valid, and disproves the conclusions of the comment. This constitutes the main point of this reply. We also provide a point-by-point response and discussion of Angelini e…
cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech
