量子叠加的次协调方法：势域中矛盾幂的形式化
The Paraconsistent Approach to Quantum Superpositions Reloaded: Formalizing Contradictory Powers in the Potential Realm
摘要：
在[7]中，这篇论文的作者支持考虑量子叠加的次协调方法（PAQS）的可能性。我们声称，尽管对量子力学（QM）的大多数解释都试图逃避矛盾，但从QM目前的技术和实验发展来看，有许多线索表明，从事这类研究可能是值得的。最近，Arenhart和Krause提出了几个反对PAQS的论点[1，2，3]。在[11，12]中，有人认为他们的推理以一种形而上学的立场为前提，根据这种立场，现实的物理表征必须完全按照以下等式来考虑：现实=现实。然而，从不同的形而上学观点来看，它们的问题就消失了。也有人认为，如果我们接受量子叠加存在于一个（矛盾的）势域的观点，那么根据次协调方法发展量子力学并声称量子叠加是矛盾的、上下文不相容的就完全有意义了。遵循这些思想，并以[10，12，15]中提出的功率和势的物理概念作为解释的立场，我们提出了量子叠加的次协调形式化，试图捕捉QM的主要特征。
英文摘要：
In [7] the authors of this paper argued in favor of the possibility to consider a Paraconsistent Approach to Quantum Superpositions (PAQS). We claimed that, even though most interpretations of quantum mechanics (QM) attempt to escape contradictions, there are many hints -coming from present technical and experimental developments in QM- that indicate it could be worth while to engage in a research of this kind. Recently, Arenhart and Krause have raised several arguments against the PAQS [1, 2, 3]. In [11, 12] it was argued that their reasoning presupposes a metaphysical stance according to which the physical representation of reality must be exclusively considered in terms of the equation: Actuality = Reality. However, from a different metaphysical standpoint their problems disappear. It was also argued that, if we accept the idea that quantum superpositions exist in a (contradictory) potential realm, it makes perfect sense to develop QM in terms of a paraconsistent approach and claim that quantum superpositions are contradictory, contextual existents. Following these ideas, and taking as a standpoint an interpretation in terms of the physical notions of power and potentia put forward in [10, 12, 15], we present a paraconsistent formalization of quantum superpositions that attempts to capture the main features of QM.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
