米列娃·马里奇与阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦的合作
The collaboration of Mileva Maric and Albert Einstein
AI总结：
本文综述米列娃·马里奇1900-1905年对爱因斯坦工作的参与，提出合作更久的新假设，并建议考虑其荣誉共同署名及深入调查其贡献。
摘要：
本文是对米列娃·马里奇（阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦的第一任妻子）在1900年至1905年间参与其理论工作的当代综述。首先，分别概述了米列娃和爱因斯坦在1896年进入苏黎世瑞士联邦理工学院之前各自的生平。随后，描述了一部合并的日志，详细记录了重要事件。除传记性概述外，本文还比较和对比了多位作者关于两种叙事的评论：其一，所发生事件的顺序及这对夫妇在特定时期的关系；其二，爱因斯坦和米列娃双方来信的内容。文中重新审视了1899年和1905年间那些信件中代词使用的某些解释，并提出了关于这些代词使用的不同假设。本文考察了多篇论文，并将每篇后续论文的内容与米列娃当时所从事的工作进行比较。通过不同的视角，本文进一步表明，这对夫妇的合作时间远长于其他作者所指出的。我们还评估了支持与反对米列娃参与爱因斯坦工作的假设的批评者和支持者，并将其置于19世纪末女性从事科学的历史背景中重新聚焦。最后，概述了合作（特别是共同署名）的定义。由此提出了建议，其一是米列娃应被认真考虑作为一篇（可能两篇）论文的荣誉共同作者；其二，建议对米列娃·马里奇在1902年至1905年间参与阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦已发表工作的程度进行严肃调查。
英文摘要：
This is a contemporary review of the involvement of Mileva Maric, Albert Einsteins first wife, in his theoretical work between the period of 1900 to 1905. Separate biographies are outlined for both Mileva and Einstein, prior to their attendance at the Swiss Federal Polytechnic in Zurich in 1896. Then, a combined journal is described, detailing significant events. In additional to a biographical sketch, comments by various authors are compared and contrasted concerning two narratives: firstly, the sequence of events that happened and the couples relationship at particular times. Secondly, the contents of letters from both Einstein and Mileva. Some interpretations of the usage of pronouns in those letters during 1899 and 1905 are re-examined, and a different hypothesis regarding the usage of those pronouns is introduced. Various papers are examined and the content of each subsequent paper is compared to the work that Mileva was performing. With a different take, this treatment further suggests that the couple continued to work together much longer than other authors have indicated. We also evaluate critics and supporters of the hypothesis that Mileva was involved in Einsteins work, and refocus this within a historical context, in terms of women in science in the late 19th century. Finally, the definition of, collaboration (co-authorship, specifically) is outlined. As a result, recommendations are stated, the first of which is that Mileva should be seriously considered as an honorary co-author of one, possibly two, papers, and secondly, of which it is recommended that a serious inquiry should be made, concerning the extent of Mileva Marićs involvement in Albert Einsteins published works between 1902 and 1905.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
