arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1503.07768cs.CR
收藏

NeuCoin:第一个安全、经济、去中心化的加密货币

NeuCoin: the First Secure, Cost-efficient and Decentralized Cryptocurrency

Kourosh Davarpanah, Dan Kaufman, Ophelie Pubellier

摘要:

NeuCoin是一种去中心化的点对点加密货币,源自Sunny King的Peercoin,而Peercoin本身则源自Satoshi Nakamoto的比特币。与Peercoin一样,权益证明取代了工作量证明作为NeuCoin的安全模型,有效地取代了比特币矿工的运营成本(电力,计算机)与持有货币的资本成本。权益证明还避免了工作量证明固有的集中化趋势,这是由于矿工之间基于最低成本电力和哈希功率的Coinbase奖励竞争造成的。NeuCoin以多种方式提高了相对于Peercoin和其他现有的权益证明货币的安全性,包括:(1)通过大幅提高采矿奖励和降低最低权益年龄来激励节点随着时间的推移不断投入硬币;(2)在采矿公式中放弃使用硬币年龄;(3)使每个权益的权益修改器参数随着时间的推移而变化;以及(4)利用惩罚试图在具有重复赌注的多个分支上挖掘的节点的客户端。本文演示了NeuCoin的权益证明实现如何解决所有常见的对通用权益证明系统的“无利害关系”异议。它还审查了工作量证明设计的许多缺陷,以强调解决这些缺陷的替代加密货币的潜力。

英文摘要:

NeuCoin is a decentralized peer-to-peer cryptocurrency derived from Sunny King's Peercoin, which itself was derived from Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin. As with Peercoin, proof-of-stake replaces proof-of-work as NeuCoin's security model, effectively replacing the operating costs of Bitcoin miners (electricity, computers) with the capital costs of holding the currency. Proof-of-stake also avoids proof-of-work's inherent tendency towards centralization resulting from competition for coinbase rewards among miners based on lowest cost electricity and hash power. NeuCoin increases security relative to Peercoin and other existing proof-of-stake currencies in numerous ways, including: (1) incentivizing nodes to continuously stake coins over time through substantially higher mining rewards and lower minimum stake age; (2) abandoning the use of coin age in the mining formula; (3) causing the stake modifier parameter to change over time for each stake; and (4) utilizing a client that punishes nodes that attempt to mine on multiple branches with duplicate stakes. This paper demonstrates how NeuCoin's proof-of-stake implementation addresses all commonly raised "nothing at stake" objections to generic proof-of-stake systems. It also reviews many of the flaws of proof-of-work designs to highlight the potential for an alternate cryptocurrency that solves these flaws.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑