arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1503.07610q-bio.NC
收藏

汉语阅读中的眼动控制:Landolt-C范式分析

Eye-Movement Control During the Reading of Chinese: An Analysis Using the Landolt-C Paradigm

Yanping Liu, Erik D. Reichle, Ren Huang

摘要:

眼动实验中的参与者执行了Landolt-C范式的修改版本(Williams & Pollatsek,2007),其中他们搜索嵌入在空间连续的“单词”的线性阵列中的目标正方形(即,具有可变大小和方向的缺失片段的正方形的短序列)。虽然单个和多个注视位置中的第一个的分布复制了先前的模式,表明眼跳瞄准(例如,Yan,Kliegl,Richter,Nuthmann,& Shu,2010),所有前向注视位置的分布是均匀的,表明不存在特定的扫视目标。此外,“词”的属性(例如,间隙大小)也影响注视持续时间和向前扫视长度,这表明正在进行的处理影响关于何时何地的决定(即,(多少)移动眼睛。这些结果的理论意义,现有的和未来的帐户的眼动控制进行了讨论。

英文摘要:

Participants in an eye-movement experiment performed a modified version of the Landolt-C paradigm (Williams & Pollatsek, 2007) in which they searched for target squares embedded in linear arrays of spatially contiguous "words" (i.e., short sequences of squares having missing segments of variable size and orientation). Although the distributions of single- and first-of-multiple fixation locations replicated previous patterns suggesting saccade targeting (e.g., Yan, Kliegl, Richter, Nuthmann, & Shu, 2010), the distribution of all forward fixation locations was uniform, suggesting the absence of specific saccade targets. Furthermore, properties of the "words" (e.g., gap size) also influenced fixation durations and forward saccade length, suggesting that on-going processing affects decisions about when and where (i.e., how far) to move the eyes. The theoretical implications of these results for existing and future accounts of eye-movement control are discussed.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑