距离界定协议的比较：决策理论支持的关键任务
Comparing Distance Bounding Protocols: a Critical Mission Supported by Decision Theory
摘要：
距离绑定协议是一种旨在阻止中继攻击的安全对策。这种攻击包括中继双方之间交换的消息，使他们相信他们直接相互通信。虽然距离绑定协议自90年代初就已经存在，但这一研究主题随着非接触式系统的部署而复活，中继攻击对非接触式系统特别有影响。考虑到每年设计的距离绑定协议的数量令人印象深刻，迫切需要为研究人员和工程师提供一种方法来公平地比较这些协议，尽管它们具有各种属性。本文介绍了这样一种方法的基础上的概念，从决策领域。该方法允许多标准比较的距离界定协议，从而确定最合适的协议，一旦上下文提供。作为一个副作用，本文清楚地确定了不应再考虑的协议，无论考虑的情况。
英文摘要：
Distance bounding protocols are security countermeasures designed to thwart relay attacks. Such attacks consist in relaying messages exchanged between two parties, making them believe they communicate directly with each other. Although distance bounding protocols have existed since the early nineties, this research topic resurrected with the deployment of contactless systems, against which relay attacks are particularly impactful. Given the impressive number of distance bounding protocols that are designed every year, it becomes urgent to provide researchers and engineers with a methodology to fairly compare the protocols in spite of their various properties. This paper introduces such a methodology based on concepts from the decision making field. The methodology allows for a multi-criteria comparison of distance bounding protocols, thereby identifying the most appropriate protocols once the context is provided. As a side effect, this paper clearly identifies the protocols that should no longer be considered, regardless of the considered scenario.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
