II的研究资料探索--无花果的解剖与接受
Research Data Explored II: the Anatomy and Reception of figshare
摘要：
这是一系列研究数据的文献计量学研究中的第二篇论文。在本文中，我们提出了一个分析的figshare，一个最大的多学科的研究资料库的日期。我们分析了归档在figshare中的项目的结构，它们的使用情况，以及它们在两个altmetrics源（PlumX和ImpactStory）中的接收情况。我们发现，figshare（1）作为尚未发表的材料的个人存储库，（2）作为新发表的研究材料的平台，（3）作为PLOS的存档。根据不同的功能，我们发现不同的文献计量学特征。从PLOS存档的项目往往来自自然科学，往往是未查看和非下载。然而，自存档项目来自各种学科，并表现出一些较高的使用模式。在altmetrics分析中，我们发现Twitter是研究数据获得最多关注的社交媒体服务;一般来说，2014年发布的研究数据在社交媒体服务中最受欢迎。PlumX在社交媒体中检测到更多的项目，并且发现比ImpactStory更高的altmetric分数。
英文摘要：
This is the second paper in a series of bibliometric studies of research data. In this paper, we present an analysis of figshare, one of the largest multidisciplinary repositories for research materials to date. We analysed the structure of items archived in figshare, their usage, and their reception in two altmetrics sources (PlumX and ImpactStory). We found that figshare acts (1) as a personal repository for yet unpublished materials, (2) as a platform for newly published research materials, and (3) as an archive for PLOS. Depending on the function, we found different bibliometric characteristics. Items archived from PLOS tend to be coming from the natural sciences and are often unviewed and non-downloaded. Self-archived items, however, come from a variety of disciplines and exhibit some patterns of higher usage. In the altmetrics analysis, we found that Twitter was the social media service where research data gained most attention; generally, research data published in 2014 were most popular across social media services. PlumX detects considerably more items in social media and also finds higher altmetric scores than ImpactStory.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
