arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1502.07357astro-ph.CO
收藏

晕质量函数:重子碰撞、拟合公式和对星系团宇宙学的意义

Halo mass function: Baryon impact, fitting formulae and implications for cluster cosmology

Sebastian Bocquet, Alex Saro, Klaus Dolag, Joseph J. Mohr

摘要:

我们使用一组流体力学(Hydro)和暗物质(DMonly)模拟校准晕质量函数(HMF)。我们探讨重子的影响,提出了一个改进的参数化球形高密度群众和确定我们的DMonly HMF和以前发表的HMF之间的差异。我们使用的\textit{Magneticum}模拟,这是非常适合的,因为他们的重子,高分辨率,高达$(3818~\textrm{Mpc})^3$的大宇宙体积的精确治疗。重子效应在全球范围内降低了星系团的质量,在给定的质量下,这导致它们的数密度降低。这种效应在高红移$z\sim2$和高质量$M_{200\textrm m}\gtrsim10^{14}M\odot$时消失。我们对南极望远镜(SPT)、\textit{Planck}和eROSITA的星团巡天进行了三种理想化近似的宇宙学分析。我们追求两个主要问题:(1)重子的影响是什么?--对于类SPT和类\textit{Planck}样品,重子对宇宙学结果的影响可以忽略不计。然而,在类似eROSITA的情况下,忽略重子撞击导致$Ω_\textrm m$被低估了大约$0.01$,这与eROSITA的预期不确定度相当。(2)我们的DMonly HMF与以前的工作相比如何?--对于\textit{Planck}样样品,使用我们的仅DM HMF获得的结果相对于使用Tinker等人(2008)拟合获得的结果偏移了$Δ(σ_8)\simeqΔ(σ_8(Ω_\textrm m/0.27)^{0.3})\simeq0.02$。这表明使用我们的HMF将使\textit{Planck}簇的结果与CMB各向异性测量更好地一致。最后,我们讨论的偏见,可以通过不充分的HMF参数化,引入虚假的宇宙学敏感性。

英文摘要:

We use a set of hydrodynamical (Hydro) and dark matter only (DMonly) simulations to calibrate the halo mass function (HMF). We explore the impact of baryons, propose an improved parametrization for spherical overdensity masses and identify differences between our DMonly HMF and previously published HMFs. We use the \textit{Magneticum} simulations, which are well suited because of their accurate treatment of baryons, high resolution, and large cosmological volumes of up to $(3818~\textrm{Mpc})^3$. Baryonic effects globally decrease the masses of galaxy clusters, which, at a given mass, results in a decrease of their number density. This effect vanishes at high redshift $z\sim2$ and for high masses $M_{200\textrm m}\gtrsim10^{14}M\odot$. We perform cosmological analyses of three idealized approximations to the cluster surveys by the South Pole Telescope (SPT), \textit{Planck}, and eROSITA. We pursue two main questions: (1) What is the impact of baryons? -- For the SPT-like and the \textit{Planck}-like samples, the impact of baryons on cosmological results is negligible. In the eROSITA-like case, however, neglecting the baryonic impact leads to an underestimate of $Ω_\textrm m$ by about $0.01$, which is comparable to the expected uncertainty from eROSITA. (2) How does our DMonly HMF compare with previous work? -- For the \textit{Planck}-like sample, results obtained using our DMonly HMF are shifted by $Δ(σ_8)\simeqΔ(σ_8(Ω_\textrm m/0.27)^{0.3})\simeq0.02$ with respect to results obtained using the Tinker et al. (2008) fit. This suggests that using our HMF would shift results from \textit{Planck} clusters toward better agreement with CMB anisotropy measurements. Finally, we discuss biases that can be introduced through inadequate HMF parametrizations that introduce false cosmological sensitivity.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑