arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1502.06599astro-ph.COgr-qc
收藏

修正的引力模型能调和类普朗克观测中CMB各向异性和透镜映射之间的张力吗?

Can modified gravity models reconcile the tension between CMB anisotropy and lensing maps in Planck-like observations?

Bin Hu, Marco Raveri

摘要:

普朗克2015年的数据似乎有利于CMB光谱中的透镜振幅参数$A_{\rm L}=1.22\pm0.10$的大值。该结果与透镜重建结果$A_{\rm L}^{ϕϕ}=0.95\pm0.04$处于$2σ$张力中。在本文中,我们模拟了几个CMB各向异性和CMB透镜光谱的基础上普朗克-2015最佳拟合宇宙学参数值和普朗克蓝皮书光束和噪声规格。我们分析了几个修改后的重力模型的有效场论框架内对这些模拟,发现模型的有效牛顿常数增强可以调制CMB各向异性谱的方式类似的$A_{\rm L}$参数。然而,为了充分地透镜CMB各向异性,如在普朗克-2015结果中,物质扰动的增长被大大增强,并给出高的$σ_8$值。当将这些数据与其他探测器结合时,这反过来又被证明是有问题的,比如CFHTLenS的弱透镜效应,它有利于较小幅度的物质波动。

英文摘要:

Planck-2015 data seem to favour a large value of the lensing amplitude parameter, $A_{\rm L}=1.22\pm0.10$, in CMB spectra. This result is in $2σ$ tension with the lensing reconstruction result, $A_{\rm L}^{ϕϕ}=0.95\pm0.04$. In this paper, we simulate several CMB anisotropy and CMB lensing spectra based on Planck-2015 best-fit cosmological parameter values and Planck blue book beam and noise specifications. We analyse several modified gravity models within the effective field theory framework against these simulations and find that models whose effective Newton constant is enhanced can modulate the CMB anisotropy spectra in a way similar to that of the $A_{\rm L}$ parameter. However, in order to lens the CMB anisotropies sufficiently, like in the Planck-2015 results, the growth of matter perturbations is substantially enhanced and gives a high $σ_8$ value. This in turn proves to be problematic when combining these data to other probes, like weak lensing from CFHTLenS, that favour a smaller amplitude of matter fluctuations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑