arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 1410.4282stat.ME
收藏

大规模多样本$t$检验中稀疏信息的引入

Incorporation of Sparsity Information in Large-scale Multiple Two-sample $t$ Tests

Weidong Liu

摘要:

大规模多个两样本{ \em Student}的$t$检验问题经常出现在科学数据的统计分析中。为了检测在两个均值向量之间具有不同值的分量,公知的过程是应用Benjamini和Hochberg(B-H)方法和双样本{ \em Student}的$t$统计量来控制错误发现率(FDR)。在许多应用中,期望均值向量是稀疏的或渐近稀疏的。在处理此类数据时,{ \em是否可以在控制FDR的同时获得比标准程序(例如使用Student $t$统计量的B-H方法)更高的功效?}答案是肯定的。通过利用平均向量中可能的稀疏信息,我们提出了一种基于不相关筛选的(US)FDR控制方法,该方法比B-H方法更强大。美国检验程序依赖于一种新的筛选统计量构造,该统计量与双样本{ \em Student}的$t$统计量渐近不相关。US测试程序不同于一些现有的{筛选后的\em测试}方法(Reiner等人,二○ ○七年; Yekutieli,2008年),其中筛选和检测之间的独立性对于控制FDR至关重要,而独立性通常需要额外的数据或样本分割。不适当的样本分割可能导致统计功效的损失而不是提高。相反,不相关的筛选US基于原始数据,不需要分割样本。理论结果表明,美国的测试程序控制所需的FDR渐近。数值研究表明,所提出的程序工作得很好。

英文摘要:

Large-scale multiple two-sample {\em Student}'s $t$ testing problems often arise from the statistical analysis of scientific data. To detect components with different values between two mean vectors, a well-known procedure is to apply the Benjamini and Hochberg (B-H) method and two-sample {\em Student}'s $t$ statistics to control the false discovery rate (FDR). In many applications, mean vectors are expected to be sparse or asymptotically sparse. When dealing with such type of data, {\em can we gain more power than the standard procedure such as the B-H method with Student's $t$ statistics while keeping the FDR under control?} The answer is positive. By exploiting the possible sparsity information in mean vectors, we present an uncorrelated screening-based (US) FDR control procedure, which is shown to be more powerful than the B-H method. The US testing procedure depends on a novel construction of screening statistics, which are asymptotically uncorrelated with two-sample {\em Student}'s $t$ statistics. The US testing procedure is different from some existing {\em testing following screening} methods (Reiner, et al., 2007; Yekutieli, 2008) in which independence between screening and testing is crucial to control the FDR, while the independence often requires additional data or splitting of samples. An inappropriate splitting of samples may result in a loss rather than an improvement of statistical power. Instead, the uncorrelated screening US is based on the original data and does not need to split the samples. Theoretical results show that the US testing procedure controls the desired FDR asymptotically. Numerical studies are conducted and indicate that the proposed procedure works quite well.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑