arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 1409.5779astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
收藏

$M_\odot$星轴对称核塌缩超新星爆炸的从头计算研究

The Development of Explosions in Axisymmetric Ab Initio Core-Collapse Supernova Simulations of 12-25 $M_\odot$ Stars

Stephen W. Bruenn, Eric J. Lentz, W. Raphael Hix, Anthony Mezzacappa, James Austin Harris, O. E. Bronson Messer, Eirik Endeve, John M. Blondin, Merek Austin Che… 展开作者

Stephen W. Bruenn, Eric J. Lentz, W. Raphael Hix, Anthony Mezzacappa, James Austin Harris, O. E. Bronson Messer, Eirik Endeve, John M. Blondin, Merek Austin Chertkow, Eric J. Lingerfelt, Pedro Marronetti, Konstantin N. Yakunin

摘要:

我们提出了四个从头算轴对称的核心坍缩超新星模拟12,15,20和25 $M_\odot$祖。所有模拟都产生爆炸,并且在核心反弹后至少1.2秒和材料首次未结合后1秒进行了演化。模拟计算与我们的嵌合体代码采用光谱中微子输运,特殊和广义相对论输运效应,和国家的最先进的中微子相互作用。持续超过1秒的进化允许爆炸更充分地发展,并且为爆炸提供动力的过程变得更加明显。我们计算爆炸能量的估计,包括恒星外壳外的冲击,0.34,0.88,0.38,和0.70 B($10^{51}$尔格)和增加0.03,0.15,0.19,和0.52 B的$^{-1}$,分别为12,15,20,和25 $M_\odot$模型的结合能。三个模型发展出明显的长扁激波形态,而20 $M_\odot$模型虽然像其他模型一样表现出波瓣和吸积流,但在爆炸开始时发展出近似球形的偏心激波,然后在反弹后600 ms变成适度的长扁$\sim$。这通过减少临界爆炸加电阶段期间的质量增加而相对于其他模型减少了爆炸能量。我们通过对能量来源和流动的详细分析,研究了模型中爆炸能量的增长。我们发现,12和20 $M_\odot$模型的爆炸能量与观测到的爆炸能量的较低范围相当,而15和25 $M_\odot$模型在观测到的爆炸能量范围内,特别是考虑到它们的爆炸能量增加的速率。由我们的模型给出的喷出的$^{56}$ Ni质量和原中子星质量和反冲速度都在观测范围内。(截短)

英文摘要:

We present four ab initio axisymmetric core-collapse supernova simulations for 12, 15, 20, and 25 $M_\odot$ progenitors. All of the simulations yield explosions and have been evolved for at least 1.2 seconds after core bounce and 1 second after material first becomes unbound. Simulations were computed with our Chimera code employing spectral neutrino transport, special and general relativistic transport effects, and state-of-the-art neutrino interactions. Continuing the evolution beyond 1 second allows explosions to develop more fully and the processes powering the explosions to become more clearly evident. We compute explosion energy estimates, including the binding energy of the stellar envelope outside the shock, of 0.34, 0.88, 0.38, and 0.70 B ($10^{51}$ ergs) and increasing at 0.03, 0.15, 0.19, and 0.52 B s$^{-1}$, respectively, for the 12, 15, 20, and 25 $M_\odot$ models. Three models developed pronounced prolate shock morphologies, while the 20 $M_\odot$ model, though exhibiting lobes and accretion streams like the other models, develops an approximately spherical, off-center shock as the explosion begins and then becomes moderately prolate $\sim$600 ms after bounce. This reduces the explosion energy relative to the other models by reducing mass accretion during the critical explosion power-up phase. We examine the growth of the explosion energy in our models through detailed analyses of the energy sources and flows. We find that the 12 and 20 $M_\odot$ models have explosion energies comparable to that of the lower range of observed explosion energies while the 15 and 25 $M_\odot$ models are within the range of observed explosion energies, particularly considering the rate at which their explosion energies are increasing. The ejected $^{56}$Ni masses given by our models are all within observational limits as are the proto-neutron star masses and kick velocities. (Truncated)

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑