arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1408.0101cs.NE
收藏

差分进化算法中的模因搜索

Memetic Search in Differential Evolution Algorithm

Sandeep Kumar, Vivek Kumar Sharma, Rajani Kumari

摘要:

差分进化算法是一种著名的优化策略,可以很容易地解决非线性和综合性问题。DE是一个众所周知的和不复杂的人口为基础的概率综合优化方法。它显然优于一些进化算法和进一步的搜索算法在静脉粒子群优化在什么时候测试两个尺度和实际世界的问题。然而,DE,像其他概率优化算法,不时地表现出沉淀收敛和停滞在次优位置。为了避免停滞现象,同时保持良好的收敛速度,一个创新的搜索策略,命名为迷因搜索DE。在计划的策略中,位置更新方程根据模因搜索策略定制。在此策略中,更好的解决方案参与更多次的位置现代化过程。位置更新方程的灵感来自于人工蜂群算法中的模因搜索。该策略被命名为差异进化中的模因搜索(MSDE)。为了证明MSDE的效率和功效,它是测试超过8个基准优化问题和三个现实世界的优化问题。还进行了比较分析之间的建议和原始DE。结果表明,预期的算法去一个好于基本DE和它的最近的偏差在大量的实验。

英文摘要:

Differential Evolution (DE) is a renowned optimization stratagem that can easily solve nonlinear and comprehensive problems. DE is a well known and uncomplicated population based probabilistic approach for comprehensive optimization. It has apparently outperformed a number of Evolutionary Algorithms and further search heuristics in the vein of Particle Swarm Optimization at what time of testing over both yardstick and actual world problems. Nevertheless, DE, like other probabilistic optimization algorithms, from time to time exhibits precipitate convergence and stagnates at suboptimal position. In order to stay away from stagnation behavior while maintaining an excellent convergence speed, an innovative search strategy is introduced, named memetic search in DE. In the planned strategy, positions update equation customized as per a memetic search stratagem. In this strategy a better solution participates more times in the position modernize procedure. The position update equation is inspired from the memetic search in artificial bee colony algorithm. The proposed strategy is named as Memetic Search in Differential Evolution (MSDE). To prove efficiency and efficacy of MSDE, it is tested over 8 benchmark optimization problems and three real world optimization problems. A comparative analysis has also been carried out among proposed MSDE and original DE. Results show that the anticipated algorithm go one better than the basic DE and its recent deviations in a good number of the experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑