社交网络中欺骗的影响
Effects of Deception in Social Networks
摘要：
诚实在生物体交换信息或资源的任何情况下都起着至关重要的作用。因此，如果代理人不能信任他们收到的信息或商品，那么不诚实就会对社会凝聚力产生破坏性影响。然而，亲社会的谎言（“白色”谎言）和反社会的谎言（即为个人利益而欺骗）之间往往存在区别，前者被认为比后者的破坏性小得多。我们使用一个基于代理的模型来表明，反社会的谎言导致社交网络变得越来越分散。因此，反社会的不诚实行为对社会社区的规模和凝聚力产生了很大的限制，为生物体提供了一个必须克服的主要障碍（例如通过发展反欺骗策略），以发展大型的社会凝聚力社区。相比之下，“善意的”谎言可以被证明是有益的，可以平滑互动流程，促进更大、更完整的网络。我们的研究结果表明，这些群体水平的影响，可以出现在二元水平的相互作用的紧急属性。亲社会谎言和反社会谎言之间的平衡可能会限制社交网络的结构，从而限制整个社会的形态。
英文摘要：
Honesty plays a crucial role in any situation where organisms exchange information or resources. Dishonesty can thus be expected to have damaging effects on social coherence if agents cannot trust the information or goods they receive. However, a distinction is often drawn between prosocial lies ('white' lies) and antisocial lying (i.e. deception for personal gain), with the former being considered much less destructive than the latter. We use an agent-based model to show that antisocial lying causes social networks to become increasingly fragmented. Antisocial dishonesty thus places strong constraints on the size and cohesion of social communities, providing a major hurdle that organisms have to overcome (e.g. by evolving counter-deception strategies) in order to evolve large, socially cohesive communities. In contrast, 'white' lies can prove to be beneficial in smoothing the flow of interactions and facilitating a larger, more integrated network. Our results demonstrate that these group-level effects can arise as emergent properties of interactions at the dyadic level. The balance between prosocial and antisocial lies may set constraints on the structure of social networks, and hence the shape of society as a whole.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
