arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1403.2181astro-ph.CO
收藏

从普朗克理论看中间宇宙的膨胀率

The expansion rate of the intermediate Universe in light of Planck

Licia Verde, Pavlos Protopapas, Raul Jimenez

摘要:

我们在红移范围0.1 < z <1.2内使用与宇宙学无关的膨胀历史测量,并将它们与宇宙微波背景导出的膨胀历史预测进行比较。其动机是调查当地(宇宙学独立)的哈勃常数H 0值和普朗克导出的H 0之间的张力是否也存在于其他红移。我们的结论是,对于LCDM模型,在0.1 < z < 1.2时,普朗克和宇宙学独立测量的哈勃参数H(z)之间没有张力(张力的几率只有1:15,统计上不显著)。考虑LCDM模型的扩展并没有改善这些几率(实际上使它们更糟),因此更倾向于更简单的模型。另一方面,H(z)数据也与局部H 0测量值不存在张力,但所有三个数据集的组合显示出高度显著的张力(比值~ 1:400)。因此,新的数据加深了普朗克和本地H 0测量之间的不匹配之谜,并且不能明确地确定它是否是一种局限于特定红移的效应。话虽如此,我们发现,假设NGC 4258脉泽距离作为H 0的正确锚,带来的几率舒适的值。此外,仅使用膨胀历史测量,我们在LCDM模型内约束H 0 = 68.5 +-3.5和Omega_m = 0.32 +-0.05,而不依赖于任何CMB先验。我们还解决了如何顺利的宇宙膨胀历史的宇宙学独立的数据的问题,并得出结论,没有证据表明偏离平滑的膨胀历史,也没有随时间变化的状态方程的值的暗能量。

英文摘要:

We use cosmology-independent measurements of the expansion history in the redshift range 0.1 < z <1.2 and compare them with the Cosmic Microwave Background-derived expansion history predictions. The motivation is to investigate if the tension between the local (cosmology independent) Hubble constant H0 value and the Planck-derived H0 is also present at other redshifts. We conclude that there is no tension between Planck and cosmology independent-measurements of the Hubble parameter H(z) at 0.1 < z < 1.2 for the LCDM model (odds of tension are only 1:15, statistically not significant). Considering extensions of the LCDM model does not improve these odds (actually makes them worse), thus favouring the simpler model over its extensions. On the other hand the H(z) data are also not in tension with the local H0 measurements but the combination of all three data-sets shows a highly significant tension (odds ~ 1:400). Thus the new data deepen the mystery of the mismatch between Planck and local H0 measurements, and cannot univocally determine wether it is an effect localised at a particular redshift. Having said this, we find that assuming the NGC4258 maser distance as the correct anchor for H0, brings the odds to comfortable values. Further, using only the expansion history measurements we constrain, within the LCDM model, H0 = 68.5 +- 3.5 and Omega_m = 0.32 +- 0.05 without relying on any CMB prior. We also address the question of how smooth the expansion history of the universe is given the cosmology independent data and conclude that there is no evidence for deviations from smoothness on the expansion history, neither variations with time in the value of the equation of state of dark energy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑