家庭自动化场景中RPL和LOADng路由协议的性能比较
Performance Comparison of the RPL and LOADng Routing Protocols in a Home Automation Scenario
摘要：
IETF提出的IPv6/6LoWPAN低功耗有损网络路由协议RPL具有很高的复杂度。另一种称为LOADng的协议是AODV的轻量级变体，作为替代解决方案出现。在本文中，我们比较了这两种协议的性能在家庭自动化的情况下，异构的流量模式，包括混合的多点到点和点到多点的路由在现实的密集的非均匀的网络拓扑结构。我们使用Contiki OS和Cooja模拟器来评估ContikiRPL实现和LOADng的基本非优化实现的行为。与以前的研究不同，我们的研究结果表明，RPL提供更短的延迟，更少的控制开销，需要更少的内存比LOADng。然而，通过更有效的洪泛和更好的路由存储算法来增强LOADng可以提高其性能。
英文摘要：
RPL, the routing protocol proposed by IETF for IPv6/6LoWPAN Low Power and Lossy Networks has significant complexity. Another protocol called LOADng, a lightweight variant of AODV, emerges as an alternative solution. In this paper, we compare the performance of the two protocols in a Home Automation scenario with heterogenous traffic patterns including a mix of multipoint-to-point and point-to-multipoint routes in realistic dense non-uniform network topologies. We use Contiki OS and Cooja simulator to evaluate the behavior of the ContikiRPL implementation and a basic non-optimized implementation of LOADng. Unlike previous studies, our results show that RPL provides shorter delays, less control overhead, and requires less memory than LOADng. Nevertheless, enhancing LOADng with more efficient flooding and a better route storage algorithm may improve its performance.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
