对比集与框架：科技写作中的个案研究
Contrastive Sets and Framing: A Case Study in Scientific Writing
摘要：
我描述了一个活动，以帮助我们的学生学习如何写一篇科学论文，通过逆向工程的对比现有的文件。我看了这个活动的三个最近的实现，并使用多认知模型方法来开始理解差异。这为进一步调查提供了合理的策略。首先，我描述了活动结构的概念和设计，以及对比集是如何构建的。我创建了一个初始的编码方案，以表征群体行为的三个实现，特别注意分析学生对话的结构的科学论文和他们的想法的原因，他们观察到的奇特功能。有一个显着的差异，学生从事的活动之间的实施，而不是所有的都可以归因于活动结构的差异，和其余的文件是关注使用资源和框架，基于案例的推理和吉布森的生态角度来理解这种差异的原因。
英文摘要：
I describe an activity created to help our students learn how to write a scientific paper by reverse engineering a contrastive set of existing papers. I look at three recent implementations of this activity and use a multiple cognitive models approach to begin understanding the variance. This leads to a reasonable strategy for further investigation. First, I describe the conception and design of the activity structure, and how a contrastive set was constructed. I create an initial coding scheme to characterize group behavior in the three implementations, with special attention paid to analyzing student dialog on the structure of scientific papers and their ideas about the reasons for the peculiar features they observe. There is a striking difference in the way students engaged with the activity between the implementations not all of which can be ascribed to differences in activity structures, and the remainder of the paper is concerned with the use of resources and framing, case-based reasoning and Gibson's ecological perspective to understand the reason for this difference.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
