对Shukla等人关于“量子等离子体中离子之间的“新吸引力”--线性化量子流体力学的失败“的评论的答复
Reply to comment of Shukla et al. on 'On "Novel attractive forces" between ions in quantum plasmas - failure of linearized quantum hydrodynamics'
摘要：
在早期的论文中，我们证明了Shukla和Eliasson基于线性量子流体力学（LQHD）报道的稠密氢中质子之间的“新吸引力”是错误的。作为基准结果，我们使用最先进的密度泛函理论（DFT）模拟。Shukla等人（arXiv：1112.5556）在对该论文的回应中声称，这种分歧是由于DFT的失败。在这里，我们表明-通过比较DFT和QHD的属性和限制-他们的声明没有科学依据，DFT是一个合适的基准更近似的方法，如QHD和LQHD。
英文摘要：
In an earlier paper we demonstrated that the "novel attractive force" between protons in dense hydrogen reported by Shukla and Eliasson based on linearized quantum hydrodynamics (LQHD) is wrong. As benchmark results we used state of the art density functional theory (DFT) simulations. In their response to that paper Shukla et al. (arXiv:1112.5556) claimed that the disagreement is due to a failure of DFT. Here we show - by comparing the properties and limitations of DFT and QHD - that their statements have no scientific basis and that DFT is a suitable benchmark for more approximate approaches such as QHD and LQHD.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
