对一些葡萄牙科技系统研究单位进行基准测试：第二版
Benchmarking some Portuguese S&T system research units: 2nd Edition
摘要：
越来越多地使用生产力和影响力指标进行评估和比较，不仅对个人研究人员，而且对机构，大学甚至国家，促进了文献计量学的发展。目前，指标正被广泛接受为一种简单和平衡的方式，以帮助同行审查和评价科学家和/或研究单位，只要他们有足够的精度和召回。本文提出了一个基准研究的一个选定的列表中有代表性的葡萄牙研究单位，一套相当完整的参数的基础上：文献计量参数，竞争项目的数量和博士学位的数量。这项研究的目的是从选定的研究单位收集在可比条件下的生产力和影响数据，使用基于公共信息的客观指标，可在线和/或从官方来源检索，因此可核实和可重复。因此，研究的重点是2003- 2006年期间的活动，这些数据来自最近的官方评估。我们研究的主要优势是应用自动化工具，以较低的成本获得相关结果。此外，对选定单位的结果表明，这种分析将非常有助于衡量科学生产力和影响，并协助同行审查。
英文摘要：
The increasing use of productivity and impact metrics for evaluation and comparison, not only of individual researchers but also of institutions, universities and even countries, has prompted the development of bibliometrics. Currently, metrics are becoming widely accepted as an easy and balanced way to assist the peer review and evaluation of scientists and/or research units, provided they have adequate precision and recall. This paper presents a benchmarking study of a selected list of representative Portuguese research units, based on a fairly complete set of parameters: bibliometric parameters, number of competitive projects and number of PhDs produced. The study aimed at collecting productivity and impact data from the selected research units in comparable conditions i.e., using objective metrics based on public information, retrievable on-line and/or from official sources and thus verifiable and repeatable. The study has thus focused on the activity of the 2003-06 period, where such data was available from the latest official evaluation. The main advantage of our study was the application of automatic tools, achieving relevant results at a reduced cost. Moreover, the results over the selected units suggest that this kind of analyses will be very useful to benchmark scientific productivity and impact, and assist peer review.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
