地面地震潜在影响分析评价中的两种不同方法：在罗马尼亚弗朗恰地震中的应用与验证
Deux approches differentes dans l'evaluation analytique du potentiel endommageant des tremblements de terre: application et validation pour les forts seismes de Vrancea, Roumanie
摘要：
本文提出了一个分析评估的结果之间的比较地震地面运动的破坏潜力，基于两个不同的参数：公园，昂损害指数和桑迪仪器地震烈度。Park Ang损伤指数由于其简单性和对实验数据的校准而主要用于结构损伤评估。仪器强度具有相对于EMS 98强度标度校准的优点。根据1977年（矩震级Mw= 7，4）和1986年（Mw= 7，1）Vrancea震源产生的强震期间记录的地面运动的处理，确定所考虑的参数的值，并生成它们的空间分布图。这两种方法的结果进行了比较，以及与所提供的信息的报告中所观察到的建筑物的有效损害，由于考虑地震。
英文摘要：
The paper presents a comparison between the results of the analytical assessments of the damage potential of seismic ground motions, based on two different parameters: the Park-Ang damage index and the Sandi instrumental seismic intensity. The Park Ang damage index is largely used for structural damage assessment due to its simplicity and its calibration against experimental data. The instrumental intensity has the advantage of being calibrated with respect to the EMS 98 intensity scale. Based on the processing of ground motions recorded during the strong earthquakes generated by the Vrancea seismic source in 1977 (moment magnitude Mw=7,4) and 1986 (Mw=7,1), the values of the considered parameters are determined and maps of their spatial distribution are generated. The results of the two approaches are compared to one another, as well as with the information provided by the reports concerning the effective damage observed in buildings due to the considered earthquakes.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
