arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1208.2685hep-phastro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
收藏

复合磁性暗物质和130 GeV谱线

Composite magnetic dark matter and the 130 GeV line

James M. Cline, Andrew R. Frey, Guy D. Moore

摘要:

我们提出了一个经济的模型来解释明显的130 GeV的伽马射线峰,发现在费米/LAT数据,在暗物质湮灭通过偶极矩相互作用。湮灭的暗物质粒子代表次主导成分,质量密度占总DM密度的7-17%;它们只通过磁(或电)偶极矩湮灭为gamma gamma、gamma Z和ZZ。由于磁偶极情况下的质量分裂或电偶极情况下的p波散射,到其他标准模型粒子的湮灭被抑制。在任何一种情况下,所观察到的信号需要强度为μ ~ 2/TeV的偶极矩。我们认为,复合模型是产生这样一个大的偶极矩的首选手段,磁的情况下是更自然的比电的。我们提出了一个简单的模型,它包含一个SU(2)规范对称性的标量和费米子技术夸克。我们指出了一些通用的挑战,让这样一个模型的工作。新的物理导致一个足够大的偶极矩是低于TeV的规模,表明磁矩是不是一个有效的有效运营商的大型强子对撞机物理,生产的强相互作用的成分,其次是技术强子化,是一个更可能的签名比超光速事件。特别是,预测了束缚态对衰变的4光子事件。

英文摘要:

We propose an economical model to explain the apparent 130 GeV gamma ray peak, found in the Fermi/LAT data, in terms of dark matter annihilation through a dipole moment interaction. The annihilating dark matter particles represent a subdominant component, with mass density 7-17% of the total DM density; and they only annihilate into gamma gamma, gamma Z, and ZZ, through a magnetic (or electric) dipole moment. Annihilation into other standard model particles is suppressed, due to a mass splitting in the magnetic dipole case, or to p-wave scattering in the electric dipole case. In either case, the observed signal requires a dipole moment of strength mu ~ 2/TeV. We argue that composite models are the preferred means of generating such a large dipole moment, and that the magnetic case is more natural than the electric one. We present a simple model involving a scalar and fermionic techniquark of a confining SU(2) gauge symmetry. We point out some generic challenges for getting such a model to work. The new physics leading to a sufficiently large dipole moment is below the TeV scale, indicating that the magnetic moment is not a valid effective operator for LHC physics, and that production of the strongly interacting constituents, followed by techni-hadronization, is a more likely signature than monophoton events. In particular, 4-photon events from the decays of bound state pairs are predicted.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑