arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1208.0645cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

关于AUC两两优化的一致性

On the Consistency of AUC Pairwise Optimization

Nanjing University(南京大学)

Wei Gao, Zhi-Hua Zhou

摘要:

ROC曲线下面积(area under ROC curve,AUC)是一个重要的评价指标,在类不平衡学习、代价敏感学习、学习排序等学习任务中得到了广泛的应用。许多学习方法都试图优化AUC,但由于AUC的非凸性和不连续性,几乎所有的学习方法都使用代理损失函数。因此,AUC的一致性至关重要;然而,它以前几乎没有被触及过。本文给出了基于代理损失函数的学习方法的渐近一致性的一个充分条件。在此基础上,我们证明了指数损失和逻辑损失与AUC是一致的,但铰链损失是不一致的。然后,我们推导出与AUC一致的$q$ -范数铰链损失和一般铰链损失。我们还得到了指数损失和逻辑损失的一致界,并得到了许多代理损失函数在无噪声设置下的一致界。此外,我们公开了AUC的指数替代损失和准确度的指数替代损失之间的等效性,并且这种发现的一个直接结果是AdaBoost和RankBoost是等效的。

英文摘要:

AUC (area under ROC curve) is an important evaluation criterion, which has been popularly used in many learning tasks such as class-imbalance learning, cost-sensitive learning, learning to rank, etc. Many learning approaches try to optimize AUC, while owing to the non-convexity and discontinuousness of AUC, almost all approaches work with surrogate loss functions. Thus, the consistency of AUC is crucial; however, it has been almost untouched before. In this paper, we provide a sufficient condition for the asymptotic consistency of learning approaches based on surrogate loss functions. Based on this result, we prove that exponential loss and logistic loss are consistent with AUC, but hinge loss is inconsistent. Then, we derive the $q$-norm hinge loss and general hinge loss that are consistent with AUC. We also derive the consistent bounds for exponential loss and logistic loss, and obtain the consistent bounds for many surrogate loss functions under the non-noise setting. Further, we disclose an equivalence between the exponential surrogate loss of AUC and exponential surrogate loss of accuracy, and one straightforward consequence of such finding is that AdaBoost and RankBoost are equivalent.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑