比较不同P2P系统中的恋童癖活动
Comparing paedophile activity in different P2P systems
摘要：
对等（P2P）系统被广泛用于在因特网上交换内容。对这类网络中恋童癖活动的了解仍然有限，但它具有重要的社会后果。此外，虽然有不同的P2P系统在使用中，以前的学术著作在这个主题上集中在一个系统的时间和他们的结果是没有直接可比性。我们设计了一种方法比较\kad和\edonkey，两个P2P系统中最突出的和不同的匿名级别。我们在几天内监控两台\edonkey服务器和\kad网络，并记录数十万个基于关键字的查询。我们检测恋童癖相关的查询与先前验证的工具，我们提出，第一次，在两个不同的P2P系统中的恋童癖活动的大规模比较。我们得出结论，\kad中的恋童癖查询显著少于\edonkey（约0.09% \vs 0.25%）。
英文摘要：
Peer-to-peer (P2P) systems are widely used to exchange content over the Internet. Knowledge on paedophile activity in such networks remains limited while it has important social consequences. Moreover, though there are different P2P systems in use, previous academic works on this topic focused on one system at a time and their results are not directly comparable. We design a methodology for comparing \kad and \edonkey, two P2P systems among the most prominent ones and with different anonymity levels. We monitor two \edonkey servers and the \kad network during several days and record hundreds of thousands of keyword-based queries. We detect paedophile-related queries with a previously validated tool and we propose, for the first time, a large-scale comparison of paedophile activity in two different P2P systems. We conclude that there are significantly fewer paedophile queries in \kad than in \edonkey (approximately 0.09% \vs 0.25%).
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
