对G.“关于”压缩试验岩石样品中压电Fission反应的组成和微化学证据“的评论[应变47（增刊2），282（2011）]”的评论。Amato等人
Comment to "Comment on 'Compositional and Microchemical Evidence of Piezonuclear Fission Reactions in Rock Specimens Subjected to Compression Tests' [Strain 47 (Suppl. 2), 282 (2011)]" by G. Amato et al
摘要：
结果表明，Carpinteri等人[Strain 47（Suppl. 2），282（2011）]发表的关于化学成分数据的评论[arXiv：1205.6418]中声称的证据-数据“不可能是作者声称的独立测量结果”-可能不一定正确。一个更简单的事实可以解释一些化学成分的相同含量测定值，而不意味着断言的不可能的相关性。更简单的原因并没有使发表的数字数据无效，只是与不正确的符号有关。另一方面，这超出了本评论的范围，意味着对数据的物理有效性或对原始论文中得出的结论进行任何评价。
英文摘要：
It is shown that the evidence asserted in the Comment [arXiv:1205.6418] on the chemical composition data published by Carpinteri et al. [Strain 47 (Suppl. 2), 282 (2011)]-that the data "cannot be the result of independent measurements as claimed by the authors" -may be not necessarily true. A simpler fact could explain the identical assay values found for some of the chemical components, without this implying the asserted impossible correlations. The simpler reason does not invalidate the published numerical data, being related only to incorrect notation. On the other hand, it is out the scope of the present comment implying any evaluation about the physical validity of the data or about the conclusions drawn in the original paper.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
