arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1111.6056quant-ph
收藏

实用私有随机数生成的安全性

Security of practical private randomness generation

Stefano Pironio, Serge Massar

摘要:

如果纠缠量子系统的测量违反了贝尔不等式,那么它们必然会产生本质上不可预测的结果。该属性可以用于以设备无关的方式生成经认证的随机性,即,而无需对用于生成随机数的量子设备的内部工作进行详细假设。此外,这些号码也是私人的,即,它们不仅对用户来说是随机的,而且对可能拥有设备的完美描述的任何对手来说也是随机的。由于这个过程需要一个小的初始随机种子,人们通常谈到设备无关的随机性扩展。本文件有两个目的。首先,我们指出,在大多数真实的实际情况下,其中设备独立性的概念被用作防止量子设备的无意缺陷或故障的保护,足以表明所生成的字符串相对于仅持有经典侧信息的对手是随机的,即,不需要针对量子侧信息来证明随机性。此外,初始随机种子不需要相对于对手是私有的,只要它是以独立于被测系统的方式生成的。然而,这些设备将生成对手无法预测的加密安全随机性,因此,如果可以访问免费的公共随机性,就可以谈论私人随机性生成。根据这些标准量化生成的随机性的理论工具已经在[S。Pironio等人,Nature 464,1021(2010)],但最终结果不适当地制定。本文的第二个目的是纠正这种不准确的提法,因此奠定了一个精确的理论框架,实际设备无关的随机性扩展。

英文摘要:

Measurements on entangled quantum systems necessarily yield outcomes that are intrinsically unpredictable if they violate a Bell inequality. This property can be used to generate certified randomness in a device-independent way, i.e., without making detailed assumptions about the internal working of the quantum devices used to generate the random numbers. Furthermore these numbers are also private, i.e., they appear random not only to the user, but also to any adversary that might possess a perfect description of the devices. Since this process requires a small initial random seed, one usually speaks of device-independent randomness expansion. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we point out that in most real, practical situations, where the concept of device-independence is used as a protection against unintentional flaws or failures of the quantum apparatuses, it is sufficient to show that the generated string is random with respect to an adversary that holds only classical-side information, i.e., proving randomness against quantum-side information is not necessary. Furthermore, the initial random seed does not need to be private with respect to the adversary, provided that it is generated in a way that is independent from the measured systems. The devices, though, will generate cryptographically-secure randomness that cannot be predicted by the adversary and thus one can, given access to free public randomness, talk about private randomness generation. The theoretical tools to quantify the generated randomness according to these criteria were already introduced in [S. Pironio et al, Nature 464, 1021 (2010)], but the final results were improperly formulated. The second aim of this paper is to correct this inaccurate formulation and therefore lay out a precise theoretical framework for practical device-independent randomness expansion.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑