量子世界中的吉尔登斯特恩和罗森克兰茨--答阿德里安·肯特
Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent
摘要：
这篇论文是对阿德里安·肯特的《一个世界与多个世界：埃弗雷特对进化、概率和科学证实的解释的不足》（One World versus Many：the Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution，Probability，and Scientific Confirmation）第一部分的回答。我们不同意肯特反对量子力学的多世界解释的论点。我们认为，他的理由，更喜欢单世界的解释是逻辑上有缺陷的，他提出的singleworld替代概率论遭受概念问题。我们用一些思想实验来证明，他提出的多元宇宙中的概率问题也适用于单一宇宙。
英文摘要：
This paper is an answer to the first part of Adrian Kent's One World versus Many : the Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution, Probability, and Scientific Confirmation [arXiv:0905.0624]. We take issue with Kent's arguments against many-world interpretations of quantum mechanics. We argue that his reasons for preferring single-world interpretations are logically flawed and that his proposed singleworld alternative to probability theory suffers from conceptual problems. We use a few thought-experiments which show that the problems he raises for probabilities in multiverses also apply in a single universe.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
