arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1111.0888astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
收藏

规则反弹宇宙中的绝热标量大扰动

Large Adiabatic Scalar Perturbations in a Regular Bouncing Universe

Sandro D. P. Vitenti, Nelson Pinto-Neto

摘要:

研究表明,具有类尘埃($w \approx 0$)流体的收缩宇宙可以为引力标量扰动提供几乎标度不变的谱。随着宇宙的收缩,这种扰动的幅度被放大。规范不变变量$Φ$发展了一个增长模式,它在反弹相附近变得比常数大得多。恒定模的振幅通过COBE归一化固定,因此增长模的振幅可以变得比1大得多。在本文中,我们首先表明,这是一个普遍的特点,弹跳模型,因为我们希望广义相对论应该是有效的,在所有尺度远离反弹。然而,在牛顿规范中,变量$Φ$给出了度规微扰$ϕ$的值,这引起了人们对反弹时线性微扰机制有效性的怀疑。为了解决这个问题,我们得到了一组必要条件的扰动系列是有效的沿整个历史的模型,我们表明,有一个规范,其中所有这些条件都得到满足,对于一组模型,如果固定的COBE规范化模式。作为这种分析的副产品,我们指出,有一些规范固定条件没有很好地定义的扰动变量的解决方案,把这些规范禁止这些解决方案。

英文摘要:

It has been shown that a contracting universe with a dust-like ($w \approx 0$) fluid may provide an almost scale invariant spectrum for the gravitational scalar perturbations. As the universe contracts, the amplitude of such perturbations are amplified. The gauge invariant variable $Φ$ develops a growing mode which becomes much larger than the constant one around the bounce phase. The constant mode has its amplitude fixed by Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) normalization, thus the amplitude of the growing mode can become much larger than 1. In this paper, we first show that this is a general feature of bouncing models, since we expect that general relativity should be valid in all scales away from the bounce. However, in the Newtonian gauge, the variable $Φ$ gives the value of the metric perturbation $ϕ$, raising doubts on the validity of the linear perturbative regime at the bounce. In order to address this issue, we obtain a set of necessary conditions for the perturbative series to be valid along the whole history of the model, and we show that there is a gauge in which all these conditions are satisfied, for a set of models, if the constant mode is fixed by COBE normalization. As a by-product of this analysis, we point out that there are sets of solutions for the perturbation variables where some gauge-fixing conditions are not well defined, turning these gauges prohibited for those solutions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑