模型驱动系统开发：试验设计和试验报告
Model-driven system development: Experimental design and report of the pilot experiment
摘要：
本报告介绍了DE设计的实验，旨在比较两个变种的模型驱动的系统开发方法，以评估需求工程实践的概念模型的质量的影响。正在评估的概念建模方法是OO方法[Pastor and Molina 2007]。它的一个变体包括沟通分析，一种面向沟通的需求工程方法[España，González et al. 2009]和一组从需求模型中导出概念模型的指导方针[España，Ruiz et al. 2011; González，España et al. 2011]。另一种变体是一种特别的、基于文本的需求实践，类似于OO方法从业者在工业项目中应用的需求实践。根据目标/问题/度量模板[Basili和Rombach 1988]总结的研究目标是：*）分析两种基于模型的信息系统分析方法变体的结果模型;即面向对象方法（OOM）和通信分析与面向对象方法的集成（CA+OOM），* ）为了进行比较评估 *）关于主题的表现和方法的接受; *）从信息系统研究者的角度 *）在本科生的背景下。
英文摘要：
This report describes de design of an experiment that intends to compare two variants of a modeldriven system development method, so as to assess the impact of requirements engineering practice in the quality of the conceptual models. The conceptual modelling method being assessed is the OO-Method [Pastor and Molina 2007]. One of its variants includes Communication Analysis, a communication-oriented requirements engineering method [España, González et al. 2009] and a set of guidelines to derive conceptual models from requirements models [España, Ruiz et al. 2011; González, España et al. 2011]. The other variant is an ad-hoc, text-based requirements practice similar to the one that is applied in industrial projects by OO-Method practitioners. The goal of the research, summarised according to the Goal/Question/Metric template [Basili and Rombach 1988], is to: *) analyse the resulting models of two model-based information systems analysis method variants; namely, the OO-Method (OOM) and the integration of Communication Analysis and the OO-Method (CA+OOM), *) for the purpose of carrying out a comparative evaluation *) with respect to performance of the subject and acceptance of the method; *) from the viewpoint of the information systems researcher *) in the context of bachelor students.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
