arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1102.5767quant-ph
收藏

量子力学坍缩理论中的悖论与原始本体论

Paradoxes and Primitive Ontology in Collapse Theories of Quantum Mechanics

Roderich Tumulka

AI总结:

本文讨论坍缩理论是否需要引入原始本体论,并指出引入原始本体论可以消除该理论的某些悖论。

摘要:

坍缩理论是量子力学的一种版本,根据该理论,波函数的坍缩是一个真实的物理过程。它们提出精确的数学定律来支配这一过程,并取代那种模糊的传统规定,即每当一个“观察者”进行一次“测量”时坍缩就发生。一个理论的“原始本体论”(大致相当于贝尔所说的“局域可存在量”)是该理论中代表时空中的物质的变量。关于坍缩理论是否需要在定义中引入原始本体论,目前尚无共识。我对这一问题作了一些评论,并指出如果引入原始本体论,关于坍缩理论的某些悖论就不存在。

英文摘要:

Collapse theories are versions of quantum mechanics according to which the collapse of the wave function is a real physical process. They propose precise mathematical laws to govern this process and to replace the vague conventional prescription that a collapse occurs whenever an "observer" makes a "measurement." The "primitive ontology" of a theory (more or less what Bell called the "local beables") are the variables in the theory that represent matter in space-time. There is no consensus about whether collapse theories need to introduce a primitive ontology as part of their definition. I make some remarks on this question and point out that certain paradoxes about collapse theories are absent if a primitive ontology is introduced.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑