探讨自主开发的美学测量应用程式（SDA）在华语学习网页界面美学测量上的应用
Probing a Self-Developed Aesthetics Measurement Application (SDA) in Measuring Aesthetics of Mandarin Learning Web Page Interfaces
摘要：
本文介绍了我们的应用程序，即自主开发的美学测量应用程序（SDA）在测量美学方面的准确性，通过比较我们的应用程序和用户的感知测量网页界面的美学的结果。在本研究中，对象、图像元素和文本元素在网页界面中的位置被定义为对象。本研究使用普通话学习网页。这些学习网页由第一作者电子档案袋网站上的主页、学习网页和练习网页组成。网页的对象被操纵，以产生所需的美学价值。所使用的六个美学相关元素是平衡，均衡，对称，序列，节奏，以及秩序和复杂性。研究结果表明，用户测量的网页界面美学值的排名与我们设计的普通话学习网页界面的预期感知一致（也在[18]中报告）。因此，它意味着美学的主观性可以用客观的方式来衡量。为了进一步了解我们在美学测量方面所做的努力，我们详细讨论了所使用的对象建模以及开发此应用程序的过程。我们还解释了如何运行我们的应用程序的步骤。此外，本文中分享的SDA应用的优点和缺点表明，美学测量仍有改进的空间。
英文摘要：
This article describes the accurateness of our application namely Self-Developed Aesthetics Measurement Application (SDA) in measuring the aesthetics aspect by comparing the results of our application and users' perceptions in measuring the aesthetics of the web page interfaces. For this research, the positions of objects, images element and texts element are defined as objects in a web page interface. Mandarin learning web pages are used in this research. These learning web pages comprised of main pages, learning pages and exercise pages, on the first author's E-portfolio web site. The objects of the web pages were manipulated in order to produce the desired aesthetic values. The six aesthetics related elements used are balance, equilibrium, symmetry, sequence, rhythm, as well as order and complexity. Results from the research showed that the ranking of the aesthetics values of the web page interfaces measured of the users were congruent with the expected perceptions of our designed Mandarin learning web page interfaces (reported also in [18]). Thus, it implies that the subjectivity of aesthetics can be measured in an objective manner. For further understanding on our effort in doing aesthetics measurement, we discussed in details the object modelling used as well as the process in developing this application. We also explained the steps on how to run our application. Additionally, the strength and the weakness of our SDA application shared in this paper suggest that there is still room for the improvement for aesthetics measurement.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
