arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1012.5818physics.ao-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
收藏

一个关于尘埃气溶胶排放的size distribution的定标理论表明,气候模式低估了全球尘埃循环的规模

A scaling theory for the size distribution of emitted dust aerosols suggests climate models underestimate the size of the global dust cycle

Jasper F. Kok

摘要:

矿物尘埃气溶胶通过与云、生态系统和辐射的相互作用影响地球的辐射收支,这在理解过去和预测未来气候变化方面构成了很大的不确定性。造成这种巨大不确定性的原因之一是,人们对排放的尘埃气溶胶的尺寸分布知之甚少。目前的研究表明,区域和全球环流模式(GCM)高估了粘土气溶胶(直径< 2 μm)的排放分数,相对于测量值的2 - 8倍。这种差异是通过推导出一个简单的理论表达式的排放粉尘的尺寸分布,是在良好的协议与测量解决。这个表达式是基于脆性材料的尺度不变的破碎,这是适用于粉尘排放的物理。由于粘土气溶胶产生强烈的辐射冷却,高估粘土部分导致GCM也高估了一定数量的排放尘埃的辐射冷却。在地方和区域尺度上,这会影响沙尘辐射强迫的大小和可能的信号,并对沙尘地区的数值天气预报和区域气候预测产生影响。在全球范围内,大多数大气环流模型中的尘埃循环被调整为与辐射测量相匹配,因此,过高估计一定数量排放尘埃的辐射冷却可能导致大气环流模型低估全球尘埃排放率。这意味着灰尘的沉积通量及其对生态系统的破坏性影响可能比想象的要大得多。

英文摘要:

Mineral dust aerosols impact Earth's radiation budget through interactions with clouds, ecosystems, and radiation, which constitutes a substantial uncertainty in understanding past and predicting future climate changes. One of the causes of this large uncertainty is that the size distribution of emitted dust aerosols is poorly understood. The present study shows that regional and global circulation models (GCMs) overestimate the emitted fraction of clay aerosols (< 2 μm diameter) by a factor of ~2 - 8 relative to measurements. This discrepancy is resolved by deriving a simple theoretical expression of the emitted dust size distribution that is in excellent agreement with measurements. This expression is based on the physics of the scale-invariant fragmentation of brittle materials, which is shown to be applicable to dust emission. Because clay aerosols produce a strong radiative cooling, the overestimation of the clay fraction causes GCMs to also overestimate the radiative cooling of a given quantity of emitted dust. On local and regional scales, this affects the magnitude and possibly the sign of the dust radiative forcing, with implications for numerical weather forecasting and regional climate predictions in dusty regions. On a global scale, the dust cycle in most GCMs is tuned to match radiative measurements, such that the overestimation of the radiative cooling of a given quantity of emitted dust has likely caused GCMs to underestimate the global dust emission rate. This implies that the deposition flux of dust and its fertilizing effects on ecosystems may be substantially larger than thought.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑