对H. Peterson等人
Comment on "NOx production in laboratory discharges simulating blue jets and red sprites" by H. Peterson et al
摘要：
Peterson等人[2009年]打算通过实验室实验确定精灵和蓝色喷流的NOx生成量。已知在标准温压下，喷射放电在物理上类似于流光放电。然而，模拟地球物理放电的流光实验需要一个极性的电压脉冲，与Peterson等人的振荡电压相反。此外，Peterson等人在电流密度、子画面体积和气体密度的比较中出错。最后，在一个重要结果中存在6个数量级的计算误差。
英文摘要：
Peterson et al. [2009] intend to determine the NOx production of sprites and blue jets from laboratory experiments. Sprite discharges are known to be physically similar to streamer discharges at standard temperature and pressure. However, streamer experiments that simulate geophysical discharges require voltage pulses of one polarity, in contrast to the oscillating voltages of Peterson et al. Furthermore, Peterson et al. make errors in their comparison of current densities, sprite volumes and gas densities. Finally, there is a calculation error of 6 orders of magnitude in an important result.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
