1986-2010年我参与铜酸盐超导的个人历史
Personal history of my engagement with cuprate superconductivity, 1986-2010
摘要：
六个月前，我被要求写一篇关于我参与铜酸盐超导体高温问题的个人历史，以相当非正式和自传的风格。随着工作的进行，我意识到，要把我早期那相当有趣但具有开创性的愤怒与我在过去十年中对这个问题的彻底重组分开是不可能的，也是不诚实的。但结果变得相当长，超过一半，其预期的收件人。这项任务让我没有义务去处理所有迷人但不相关的现象学，我在路上或多或少本能地忽略了这些现象学，但这一特点也无法使这篇文章受到任何可能的编辑委员会的喜爱，编辑委员会中有关于这一主题的知识渊博的专家。此外，他们的目的是为它作为一个（引用）介绍更技术性的辩论，但它的信息是，几乎所有这些都是不相关的。总的来说，他们并没有专注于理解关键的实验异常，其中许多，如果不是大多数，现在已经被理解了。问题的关键是从Gutzwiller投影的必要性出发，提出了一种处理约束Hilbert空间的新方法。
英文摘要：
Six months ago I was asked to write a personal history of my engagement with the high-Tc problem of the cuprate superconductors, in rather informal and autobiographical style. As the work proceeded I realized that it was impossible and would have been dishonest to separate out my rather amusing but seminal early fumblings from the complete restructuring of the problem which I have achieved during the past decade. But the result became considerably too long, by over half, for its intended recipient. The assignment had left me with no obligation to deal with all the fascinating but irrelevant phenomenology which I had more or less instinctively ignored on my way, but that feature also fails to endear the article to any conceivable editorial board containing knowledgeable experts on the subject. Also, their purpose was for it to serve as a (quote) introduction to the more technical debates, but its message is that almost all of these are not relevant. They are not, on the whole, focused on achieving understanding of the crucial experimental anomalies, many, if not most, of which are now understood. The key to the problem is a new method of dealing with the constrained Hilbert space which follows from the necessity of Gutzwiller projection.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
