arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1010.4686stat.MEq-bio.GN
收藏

结构与假设:GWAS中$\times$基因与环境相互作用的研究策略

Structures and Assumptions: Strategies to Harness Gene $\times$ Gene and Gene $\times$ Environment Interactions in GWAS

Charles Kooperberg, Michael LeBlanc, James Y. Dai, Indika Rajapakse

摘要:

全基因组关联研究在数千个样本中测量多达一百万个单核苷酸多态性(SNP),正在迅速成为鉴定与许多表型相关的遗传因素的常见研究类型。有一个强有力的假设,即SNP或基因之间的相互作用以及基因与环境因素之间的相互作用实质上有助于疾病的遗传风险。这种相互作用的识别可能会增加对疾病机制的理解;药物$\times$基因相互作用可能对个性化医疗有深远的应用;强相互作用效应可能有利于风险预测模型。在本文中,我们提供了一个不同的方法来模型的相互作用的概述,强调的方法,使遗传数据的结构的具体使用,以及那些作出具体的建模假设,可能(或可能不)是合理的。我们的结论是,为了识别相互作用,通常有必要对SNP进行一些选择,例如,基于先前的假设或边缘显著性,但是为了识别与疾病边缘相关的SNP,考虑大量的相互作用也可能是有用的。

英文摘要:

Genome-wide association studies, in which as many as a million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) are measured on several thousand samples, are quickly becoming a common type of study for identifying genetic factors associated with many phenotypes. There is a strong assumption that interactions between SNPs or genes and interactions between genes and environmental factors substantially contribute to the genetic risk of a disease. Identification of such interactions could potentially lead to increased understanding about disease mechanisms; drug $\times$ gene interactions could have profound applications for personalized medicine; strong interaction effects could be beneficial for risk prediction models. In this paper we provide an overview of different approaches to model interactions, emphasizing approaches that make specific use of the structure of genetic data, and those that make specific modeling assumptions that may (or may not) be reasonable to make. We conclude that to identify interactions it is often necessary to do some selection of SNPs, for example, based on prior hypothesis or marginal significance, but that to identify SNPs that are marginally associated with a disease it may also be useful to consider larger numbers of interactions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑