评Cloet和Miller的“质子的第三Zemach矩”
Comment on "The third Zemach moment of the proton", by Cloet and Miller
摘要：
Cloet和Miller在arXiv：1008.4345中指出：“现有的数据排除了第三泽马赫矩的值足够大，可以解释目前的难题，质子电荷半径是从μ介子氢的兰姆位移确定的。这与De Rújula最近的说法[arXiv：1008.3861]形成对照"。更准确地说：它不是。然而，我的主张与他们的主张相反。Cloet和Miller只是误解了我的主张。
英文摘要：
Cloet and Miller, in arXiv:1008.4345, state that "existing data rule out a value of the third Zemach moment large enough to explain the current puzzle with the proton charge radius determined from the Lamb shift in muonic Hydrogen. This is in contrast with the recent claim of De Rújula [arXiv:1008.3861]". To be more precise: it is not. It is, however, contrary to what they claim that I claim. Cloet and Miller have simply misinterpreted my claims.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
